Choreography vs Orchestration: What’s Best for Our App? #7
-
Let's discuss the pros and cons of using choreography (event-driven communication) vs orchestration (centralized control) in our current architecture. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
I believe choreography is better suited if our app is event-driven and composed of loosely coupled services that need to evolve independently. It encourages autonomy — services just react to events and don’t need to know the full picture. It also scales better for teams working on microservices in parallel. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for your reply? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We need centralized control (e.g. complex workflows, explicit control over steps). The workflow is sequential and business-critical, where step-by-step tracking, retries, or compensation logic is needed. Observability and auditability are top priorities. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi sole, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
We need centralized control (e.g. complex workflows, explicit control over steps).
The workflow is sequential and business-critical, where step-by-step tracking, retries, or compensation logic is needed.
Observability and auditability are top priorities.