Skip to content

Commit 9324739

Browse files
committed
Interlink between articles
1 parent 666317d commit 9324739

File tree

2 files changed

+4
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+4
-0
lines changed

content/snippets/articles/s/no-code-is-inherently-evil.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ But here's the twist: even your _best_ code will eventually be stretched, twiste
3737

3838
That's not evil; it's just entropy. The real evil is refusing to change, or worse, contorting your code into unrecognizable shapes to fit every edge case. Sometimes, the right move is to **write more code**, even if it means duplicating logic or starting over. **Refactor later**, when you know what actually matters.
3939

40+
@[You may also like](/articles/s/tech-stack-refactoring-problems)
41+
4042
Remember, code isn't sacred. It's a tool. Use it, break it, throw it away, and write more whenever you need to.
4143

4244
## Conclusion

content/snippets/articles/s/technical-debt.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ In the latter case, the debt might have been incurred due to a change in the bus
2525

2626
Interestingly enough, poor code and not following best practices only account for a portion of technical debt. This means that, while following best practices and writing clean code can help reduce the debt, they are usually not the main cause.
2727

28+
@[You may also like](/articles/s/tech-stack-refactoring-problems)
29+
2830
## Symptoms
2931

3032
So, how do you know if you have accumulated technical debt? It's not that hard to spot most of the time. **Lowered productivity** is usually one of the first signs. This translates to increased development time or effort estimates that are not met. This makes sense intuitively, as maintenance costs mount up and the codebase is not as easy to work with as it should be.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)