docs: Post-merge documentation sync for PR #575

[Eibon7]

Post-Merge Documentation Sync - PR #575

Summary

Comprehensive post-merge documentation synchronization for PR #575 (feat/issue-420-demo-fixtures) following the 7-phase doc sync protocol.

Merged PR: #575 at 2025-10-20T17:24:37Z
Sync Analysis: Post-merge validation and documentation coherence check

---

Sync Analysis Results

Files Analyzed: 57 total

Breakdown:

• Documentation: 45 files (planning docs, test evidence, CodeRabbit review fixes)
• Source Code: 1 file (src/middleware/inputValidation.js)
• Configuration: 11 files (package.json, CI/CD workflows, GDD configs)

GDD Nodes Validated: 3 primary nodes

1. guardian.md - Security validation updates (already documented)
2. queue-system.md - Demo mode + fixtures (already documented)
3. observability.md - CI/CD workflow updates (already documented)

Sync Decision: ✅ NO updates needed

Rationale:

1. Documentation PR Nature:

   • 45/57 files are documentation artifacts (planning, evidence, summaries)
   • CodeRabbit review responses don't change system architecture
   • Fixes applied were markdown linting (language specifiers)

2. Minimal Code Changes:

   • Only 1 source file: src/middleware/inputValidation.js
   • Security improvements were pre-existing (commit 4c86e0f)
   • Already documented in guardian.md node
   • No new APIs, contracts, or architectural changes

3. System Documentation Already Reflects Current State:

   • guardian.md documents inputValidation.js security features
   • queue-system.md documents demo mode architecture
   • observability.md documents CI/CD workflows

Conclusion: System documentation already reflects current state. No synchronization needed.

---

GDD Health Metrics

Current Status:

• Overall Health Score: 88.3/100 🟢 HEALTHY
• Drift Risk: 6/100 (average across 15 nodes) 🟢 HEALTHY
• Nodes Validated: 15/15 ✅
• Coverage Integrity Violations: 8 warnings (missing coverage data - expected)

Drift Analysis:

• High Risk Nodes (>60): 0
• At Risk Nodes (31-60): 0
• Healthy Nodes (0-30): 15

---

Protocol Compliance - 7 Phases

Phase	Status	Details
1. File Detection → Node Mapping	✅ Complete	57 files → 3 nodes
2. Sync GDD Nodes	✅ Complete	No updates needed (rationale documented)
3. Sync spec.md	✅ Complete	No changes needed
4. Validate system-map.yaml	✅ Complete	0 errors, 0 warnings
5. Generate Sync Report	✅ Complete	171-line comprehensive report
6. Commit & Push	✅ Complete	Commit cde8dac
7. Drift Prediction	✅ Complete	6/100 risk - HEALTHY

---

Files Changed

New Files

• docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (171 lines) - Comprehensive sync analysis

Summary

This PR adds a single documentation file that provides:

• Complete analysis of PR feat(demo): Add fixtures and seeds for Demo Mode - Issue #420 #575's impact on GDD nodes
• Rationale for why no node updates were needed
• GDD health metrics snapshot
• Protocol compliance verification

---

Final Status

🟢 DOCUMENTATION COHERENT

• GDD Health: 88.3/100 (HEALTHY)
• Drift Risk: 6/100 (HEALTHY)
• Documentation Coherence: ✅ Verified
• System Map: ✅ Valid
• No regressions detected

Safe to merge immediately - This is a documentation-only PR with no code changes.

---

Related

• Original PR: feat(demo): Add fixtures and seeds for Demo Mode - Issue #420 #575 (feat/issue-420-demo-fixtures) - MERGED
• Merge Time: 2025-10-20T17:24:37Z
• CodeRabbit Reviews:
  • #3357231143 (5/5 comments resolved)
  • #3357176234 (Pattern chore(deps-frontend):(deps): bump browserslist from 4.25.1 to 4.25.2 in /frontend #8 application - 7/8 pre-resolved)
• Protocol: 7-phase doc sync workflow
• Full Analysis: docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude [email protected]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Rate limiting now supports IPv6 addresses, improving compatibility for users on IPv6 networks
  • Enhanced error resilience for API services with improved fallback handling to maintain service availability

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This PR consolidates refactoring across feature flags, IPv6 rate-limiting support, test infrastructure improvements, and documentation updates. Changes span source code modernization (centralized feature-flag utility, Promise.allSettled adoption), middleware enhancements, import pattern standardization across tests, and extensive documentation/evidence updates.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Feature Flag Centralization src/utils/featureFlags.js, src/routes/roast.js, src/services/perspectiveService.js	New shared isFlagEnabled() utility with defensive error handling; feature-flag checks refactored to use centralized function across multiple service modules.
IPv6 Rate-Limiting Support src/middleware/security.js, src/middleware/adminRateLimiter.js, src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js, src/routes/shield.js, src/routes/triage.js, src/middleware/inputValidation.js	Added ipKeyGenerator import from express-rate-limit to all rate-limiter configurations for proper IPv6 handling.
Roast API Refactoring src/routes/roast.js, src/routes/dashboard.js, src/middleware/roastRateLimiter.js	Moved POST /api/roast/preview from dashboard.js to roast.js; added no-op test-environment guard in roastRateLimiter; feature-flag wiring with try/catch error handling.
Service Layer Updates src/services/perspectiveService.js, src/services/PersonaService.js	Promise.all → Promise.allSettled for batch resilience in perspectiveService; logger import style updated in PersonaService to destructured pattern (Issue #618).
Test Infrastructure & Import Refactoring tests/integration/roast.test.js, tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js, tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js, tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js, tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js, tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js, tests/qa/token-management-tests.js, tests/qa/webhook-tests.js	Changed app import from default export to named export across all test files; expanded roast.test.js with production-mock validation and credit-system checks.
Test Path & Cleanup Corrections tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js, tests/integration/cli/setup.js, tests/setupEnvOnly.js	CLI entry paths corrected from ../../../cli.js to ../../../src/cli.js; fs.remove replaced with fs/promises.rm with recursive/force options; removed global feature-flag mocks in setupEnvOnly.js.
Review & Evidence Documentation docs/plan/review-3357480921.md, docs/plan/review-3358102684.md, docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md, docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/verification.txt, docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-2.md, docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md, docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md, docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/verification.txt	New comprehensive review plans, verification results, test-fixing checkpoints, and evidence summaries documenting findings, fixes, patterns, and validation steps for multiple reviews and issues.
Sync Reports & Patterns docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md, docs/patterns/coderabbit-lessons.md	PR-575 sync report documenting 57 touched files; patterns documentation updated with new Jest integration and fs-extra sections (sections 9-10).
Guardian Audit & Case Logs docs/guardian/audit-log.md, docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-*.json, docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-*.json, docs/guardian/guardian-report.md	New guardian case records (auto-approved and blocked incidents) with timestamps, violations, and approval workflows; audit log and report timestamp updated.
System Metadata & Status docs/system-validation.md, gdd-status.json, gdd-write-signatures.json, .gdd-backups/.gdd-test-security.txt.2025-10-13T15-09-13-810Z.backup	System validation timestamp and duration updated; gdd-status.json timestamp updated; gdd-write-signatures.json expanded with 159 new signature entries; backup file removed.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test
    participant RoastAPI as Roast API
    participant isFlagEnabled as Feature<br/>Flag Check
    participant Service as Service<br/>(Real/Mock)
    participant Fallback as Fallback<br/>Handler

    Test->>RoastAPI: Request (preview/generate)
    RoastAPI->>isFlagEnabled: isFlagEnabled(flag)
    
    alt Flag Enabled
        isFlagEnabled-->>RoastAPI: true
        RoastAPI->>Service: Initialize with real config
        alt Success
            Service-->>RoastAPI: Service ready
            RoastAPI-->>Test: Process request
        else Failure
            Service-->>RoastAPI: Error
            RoastAPI->>Fallback: Use fallback/mock
            Fallback-->>RoastAPI: Mock service
            RoastAPI-->>Test: Response with mock
        end
    else Flag Disabled
        isFlagEnabled-->>RoastAPI: false
        RoastAPI->>Fallback: Use fallback directly
        Fallback-->>RoastAPI: Mock service
        RoastAPI-->>Test: Response with mock
    end

Loading

sequenceDiagram
    participant Batch as perspectiveService<br/>Batch Process
    participant AllSettled as Promise<br/>.allSettled
    participant Item1 as Item 1
    participant Item2 as Item 2 (Fails)
    participant Item3 as Item 3

    Batch->>AllSettled: Submit batch items
    AllSettled->>Item1: Process
    AllSettled->>Item2: Process
    AllSettled->>Item3: Process
    
    Item1-->>AllSettled: ✓ Success
    Item2-->>AllSettled: ✗ Error + log warning
    Item3-->>AllSettled: ✓ Success
    
    AllSettled-->>Batch: [fulfilled(result1),<br/>rejected(mock2),<br/>fulfilled(result3)]
    Batch-->>Batch: Preserve successful,<br/>substitute mock for failed

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes

Rationale: This PR exhibits high heterogeneity across multiple domains (feature flags, IPv6 support, test infrastructure, services refactoring, extensive documentation). While many test import changes are repetitive and straightforward, the roast API refactoring, perspectiveService batch handling, error-recovery logic, and integration test expansion require careful reasoning per file. The addition of 30+ new guardian case JSON files is voluminous but homogeneous. The distributed nature of IPv6 rate-limiter changes across 6+ files and the interconnected feature-flag refactoring (utility + 3+ consumption points) demand systematic verification across a wide file scope.

Possibly related issues

• [Test Fix] Roast Generation Test Suite - Core Flow, Validation, Enhanced Features #483: Direct overlap with roast-related test failures; PR updates src/routes/roast.js and tests/integration/roast.test.js, addressing feature-flagging and test wiring for roast endpoints.

Possibly related PRs

• feat: Add API verification scripts - Issue #490 #584: Both PRs centralize isFlagEnabled in src/utils/featureFlags.js and refactor perspectiveService to use Promise.allSettled, indicating substantial code-level overlap in the same functions.
• docs: Sync documentation - PR #617 #620: Both PRs modify src/services/perspectiveService.js; the retrieved PR introduced GDPR-safe hashing while this PR refactors flag usage and batch handling.
• feat: SPEC 9 - Style profile extraction for Pro/Plus users #400: Both PRs introduce/centralize the isFlagEnabled feature-flag utility and update modules to use it instead of local flag helpers.

Suggested labels

documentation, testing, refactor, Security, gdd

Poem

🐰 Flags now centralize with care,
IPv6 roams everywhere,
Tests import by name, not default way,
Feature-safe guardians keep errors at bay,
Promise.allSettled resilience in play!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is comprehensive and well-structured with detailed information about the sync analysis, GDD health metrics, protocol compliance, and files changed. However, it does not follow the required template structure specified in the repository. The template requires specific sections including "Resolves Issue: #", "Descripción" (in Spanish), a mandatory Checklist with defined items (tests, spec.md updates, visual evidence, changelog, scope verification), "Cambios Principales", and "Notas para Reviewer". The provided description omits the checklist entirely and deviates from the prescribed format, even though it provides substantial context and detail.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "docs: Post-merge documentation sync for PR #575" is fully related to the main change in the changeset, which adds a comprehensive sync analysis report file. The title is concise, clear, and specific—a teammate scanning the repository history would immediately understand this is a documentation synchronization following the merge of PR #575, with no misleading or vague terminology. The title accurately reflects the primary purpose and content of the change.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/post-merge-sync-pr-575

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (1)

171-171: Remove marketing attribution from technical report.

Line 171 includes attribution to "Claude Code" with a link, which is unusual for a technical sync report. Consider removing this line to maintain a professional, neutral tone.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0901633 and cde8dac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

docs/**/*.md: Do not include example environment variable values in public docs; instead write '🔐 Requires environment variables'
Never expose secrets, API keys, tokens, or .env variable names in receipts or public documentation

Files:

• docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md

153-153: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Lint and Test

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (1)

5-5: Branch name mismatch with PR objectives.

Line 5 shows docs/sync-pr-584 but PR objectives indicate the source branch is docs/post-merge-sync-pr-575. Verify this is intentional or correct to match the actual branch name.

[github-actions]

🧠 GDD Validation Summary

Overall Status: 🔴 CRITICAL

Metric	Value	Status
Health Score	88.4/100	🟡
Drift Risk	6/100	🟢
Nodes Validated	15	✅
Coverage Integrity	15 violations	🔴
Coverage	0%	🟡

Health Breakdown

• 🟢 Healthy nodes: 15
• 🟡 Degraded nodes: 0
• 🔴 Critical nodes: 0

Drift Analysis

• 🟢 Low risk: 15
• 🟡 At risk: 0
• 🔴 High risk: 0

✅ Safe to Merge

All GDD checks passed. Documentation is in sync with implementation.

---

📊 Detailed Reports:

• System Validation
• Health Report
• Drift Report

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (1)

82-86: Avoid logging user text content (privacy risk).

textPreview can leak PII/user content into logs. Remove it; log only length and a non-reversible content hash if needed.

Apply this diff:

-        } catch (error) {
-            logger.error('Perspective API analysis failed:', {
-                error: error.message,
-                textLength: text.length,
-                textPreview: text.substring(0, 100)
-            });
+        } catch (error) {
+            logger.error('Perspective API analysis failed:', {
+                error: error.message,
+                textLength: text.length,
+                // Optional: short content fingerprint for correlation without storing content
+                textHash: crypto.createHash('sha256').update(text).digest('hex').slice(0, 8)
+            });

Add at top:

const crypto = require('crypto');

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)

docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (2)

140-147: Language consistency fix applied.

Spanish/English mix resolved; section is now consistent English. LGTM.

---

153-153: Heading syntax fix applied.

Replaced bold with H2 heading for “SAFE TO MERGE”. Satisfies MD036. LGTM.

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (4)

38-41: Verify Perspective API key usage with googleapis; prefer explicit key param.

Some googleapis clients expect API keys via key on each request, not auth. Pass key: this.apiKey to comments.analyze (and keep/remove auth accordingly).

Apply this diff to the analyze call:

-            const response = await this.client.comments.analyze({
-                resource: request
-            });
+            const response = await this.client.comments.analyze({
+                key: this.apiKey,
+                resource: request
+            });

If verified, consider removing auth: this.apiKey from the client init:

-            this.client = google.commentanalyzer({
-                version: 'v1alpha1',
-                auth: this.apiKey
-            });
+            this.client = google.commentanalyzer({
+                version: 'v1alpha1'
+            });

Also applies to: 75-77

---

10-18: Duplicate isFlagEnabled helper; centralize to avoid drift.

This reimplements the helper already present in src/routes/roast.js. Extract a shared util (e.g., utils/featureFlags.js) and reuse.

---

215-223: Batch error handling drops entire batch; use per-item fallback.

A single failure causes mock results for the whole batch. Use Promise.allSettled to preserve successes and only mock failures.

Apply this diff:

-            try {
-                const batchResults = await Promise.all(batchPromises);
-                results.push(...batchResults);
-            } catch (error) {
-                logger.error('Batch analysis failed:', error);
-                // Add mock results for failed batch
-                const mockResults = batch.map(text => this.getMockAnalysis(text, true));
-                results.push(...mockResults);
-            }
+            const settled = await Promise.allSettled(batchPromises);
+            settled.forEach((r, idx) => {
+                if (r.status === 'fulfilled') {
+                    results.push(r.value);
+                } else {
+                    logger.warn('Analyze failed for item in batch:', { index: i + idx, err: r.reason?.message });
+                    results.push(this.getMockAnalysis(batch[idx], true));
+                }
+            });

---

25-27: Reduce log noise in tests (optional).

Gate this warning in test to keep CI logs clean.

Apply this diff:

-        if (!this.enabled) {
-            logger.warn('Perspective API disabled or API key not configured');
+        if (!this.enabled) {
+            if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'test') {
+                logger.warn('Perspective API disabled or API key not configured');
+            } else {
+                logger.info('Perspective API disabled or API key not configured (test)');
+            }
             return;
         }

docs/plan/review-3357480921.md (3)

5-5: Avoid bare URL (MD034).

Wrap the URL in angle brackets or link syntax.

Apply this diff:

-**Review URL:** https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3357480921
+**Review URL:** <https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3357480921>

---

221-221: Capitalize “Markdown”.

Proper noun per style/lint.

Apply this diff:

-**Benefits:**
-- Proper markdown heading (appears in TOC)
+**Benefits:**
+- Proper Markdown heading (appears in TOC)

---

320-323: Remove marketing attribution from commit template.

Keep reports vendor‑neutral; drop attribution/footer lines.

Apply this diff:

-🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
-
-Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

tests/integration/roast.test.js (2)

197-215: Tighten assertions; broad status set reduces test signal.

Accepting [200, 201, 400, 402, 503] makes failures invisible. Assert success path or assert error shape explicitly.

Apply this diff:

-            // NOTE: In mock mode, this might behave differently than preview
-            // Validate that endpoint exists and handles request
-            expect([200, 201, 400, 402, 503]).toContain(response.status);
-
-            if (response.status === 200 || response.status === 201) {
-                expect(response.body.success).toBe(true);
-                expect(response.body.roast).toBeTruthy();
-            }
+            if (response.status === 200 || response.status === 201) {
+                expect(response.body.success).toBe(true);
+                expect(response.body.roast).toBeTruthy();
+            } else {
+                expect([400, 402, 503]).toContain(response.status);
+                expect(response.body.success).toBe(false);
+                expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('error');
+            }

---

1-12: Test file organization vs guidelines.

Guidelines recommend one integration test file per platform (<platform>.test.js). Consider splitting platform-specific cases or moving them to per‑platform files, keeping this as general roast flow.

Also applies to: 329-346

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cde8dac and 6453fcc.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)

• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md (1 hunks)
• docs/plan/review-3357480921.md (1 hunks)
• docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/SUMMARY.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/files-removed.txt (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/gdd-validation-results.txt (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/verification.txt (1 hunks)
• src/middleware/roastRateLimiter.js (1 hunks)
• src/routes/dashboard.js (1 hunks)
• src/routes/roast.js (3 hunks)
• src/services/perspectiveService.js (2 hunks)
• tests/integration/roast.test.js (2 hunks)
• tests/setupEnvOnly.js (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/verification.txt
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/files-removed.txt

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (6)

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

docs/**/*.md: Do not include example environment variable values in public docs; instead write '🔐 Requires environment variables'
Never expose secrets, API keys, tokens, or .env variable names in receipts or public documentation

Files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/SUMMARY.md
• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md
• docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md
• docs/plan/review-3357480921.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md

docs/test-evidence/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

For UI/frontend changes, include visual evidence (screenshots and report) under docs/test-evidence/

Files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/SUMMARY.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/gdd-validation-results.txt
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md

src/**/*.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.js: Use utils/logger.js for logging; do not use console.log in application code
Do not hardcode credentials or tokens; use environment variables for secrets

Files:

• src/middleware/roastRateLimiter.js
• src/services/perspectiveService.js
• src/routes/roast.js
• src/routes/dashboard.js

docs/plan/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

For issues meeting thresholds (AC ≥3 or multi-area), create a mini-plan in docs/plan/.md before implementation

Files:

• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md
• docs/plan/review-3357480921.md

tests/integration/*.test.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Create an integration test file per platform named .test.js under tests/integration/

Files:

• tests/integration/roast.test.js

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.test.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

All new code must be accompanied by unit and/or integration tests using *.test.js naming under tests/unit or tests/integration

Files:

• tests/integration/roast.test.js

🧠 Learnings (4)

📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z
Learning: Issue #401 (SPEC 11 UI MVP QA Final Polish) VERIFICACIÓN FINAL 27/09/2025: COMPLETA AL 100%. Los 3 elementos implementados exitosamente: (1) GDPR copy "Los roasts autopublicados llevan firma de IA" en AjustesSettings.jsx línea 662, (2) Shield tab gating implementado, (3) Límites globales por plan implementados - isPlatformAtLimit removido completamente, migración a useSocialAccounts exitosa. Issue lista para cerrar.

Applied to files:

• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md

📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z
Learning: Issue #401 (SPEC 11 UI MVP QA Final Polish) VERIFICACIÓN DEFINITIVA 27/09/2025: COMPLETA AL 100%. Los 3 elementos implementados correctamente: (1) Shield tab gating con ENABLE_SHIELD_UI en Settings.jsx línea 735, (2) GDPR copy exacto "Los roasts autopublicados llevan firma de IA" en AjustesSettings.jsx línea 662, (3) Límites globales por plan COMPLETAMENTE MIGRADOS - isPlatformAtLimit eliminado, useSocialAccounts hook implementado con lógica maxConnections = planTier === 'free' ? 1 : 2 en dashboard.jsx línea 280. Issue lista para cerrar definitivamente.

Applied to files:

• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md

📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z
Learning: Issue #401 (SPEC 11 UI MVP QA Final Polish) verificación final 27/09/2025: 2/3 elementos completados. Shield tab gating (✅) y GDPR copy (✅) implementados correctamente. Dashboard aún mantiene isPlatformAtLimit() función antigua con límites per-platform en lugar de migrar a useSocialAccounts hook para límites globales por plan. NO está completo al 100%, NO se puede cerrar.

Applied to files:

• docs/plan/review-3357403780.md

📚 Learning: 2025-10-20T17:25:56.746Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-20T17:25:56.746Z
Learning: Use GDD validation and health scoring before PR: Health ≥87, Drift <60, Tests 100%, Coverage: auto

Applied to files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3357403780/gdd-validation-results.txt

🧬 Code graph analysis (4)

src/middleware/roastRateLimiter.js (1)

tests/setupSpec14.js (1)

• res (198-203)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (2)

src/routes/roast.js (1)

• isFlagEnabled (51-58)

src/config/flags.js (1)

• flags (311-311)

src/routes/roast.js (2)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (1)

• isFlagEnabled (11-18)

src/config/flags.js (1)

• flags (311-311)

tests/integration/roast.test.js (2)

src/routes/roast.js (9)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (24-33)
• require (37-37)
• require (38-38)
• require (41-41)
• require (295-295)
• platform (1223-1223)

src/index.js (5)

• require (27-36)
• require (37-37)
• require (44-44)
• response (808-813)
• app (74-74)

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/plan/review-3357403780.md

[grammar] ~14-~14: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ... ### ⚠️ Warnings (2 total) #### W1: Out of Scope Changes Check (NEW FILES DETECT...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

---

[grammar] ~14-~14: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...# ⚠️ Warnings (2 total) #### W1: Out of Scope Changes Check (NEW FILES DETECTED)...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

---

[grammar] ~200-~200: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...Root Cause:** 75% coverage achieved but 5pp short of 80% threshold. Frequency: ...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

docs/plan/review-3357480921.md

[uncategorized] ~221-~221: Did you mean the formatting language “Markdown” (= proper noun)?
Context: ...FE TO MERGE ``` Benefits: - Proper markdown heading (appears in TOC) - Consistent w...

(MARKDOWN_NNP)

docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md

[uncategorized] ~59-~59: Did you mean the formatting language “Markdown” (= proper noun)?
Context: ...nglish for technical docs) - Use proper markdown headings (##) instead of bold for secti...

(MARKDOWN_NNP)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/plan/review-3357480921.md

159-159: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

docs/test-evidence/review-3357480921/SUMMARY.md

159-159: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)

• GitHub Check: Lint and Test
• GitHub Check: verify_spec_scenarios
• GitHub Check: performance_benchmarks
• GitHub Check: validate_coverage
• GitHub Check: build-check

🔇 Additional comments (5)

tests/setupEnvOnly.js (1)

31-39: LGTM! Improved test isolation.

Removing the global feature flag mock and directing developers to use per-test mocks is the correct approach. This eliminates interference with integration tests that need real FeatureFlags behavior while maintaining flexibility for unit tests.

The inline guidance is clear and actionable.

src/middleware/roastRateLimiter.js (1)

156-159: LGTM! Appropriate test environment handling.

Disabling rate limiting in test environments prevents flakiness and aligns with the test strategy adjustments across the codebase (see also src/routes/roast.js line 119). The early return pattern is clean and well-documented.

src/routes/dashboard.js (1)

220-222: LGTM! Clear migration note.

The comment appropriately documents the endpoint relocation and prevents future confusion. Good housekeeping.

src/routes/roast.js (2)

49-58: LGTM! Excellent defensive programming.

The isFlagEnabled helper adds necessary robustness for test environments where flags.isEnabled might be unavailable. The pattern is consistent with src/services/perspectiveService.js (lines 10-17), promoting code consistency across the codebase.

The try-catch with warning logs provides good observability without breaking functionality.

---

61-61: LGTM! Consistent flag checking.

Replacing direct flag access with the safe isFlagEnabled helper at all initialization points ensures consistent error handling and test compatibility across all feature-gated services.

Also applies to: 75-75, 90-90

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (3)

tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (1)

449-507: Remove duplicated "End-to-End Log Management Flow" block.

The block at Lines 449-507 duplicates the earlier block at Lines 373-447, causing redundant execution and longer/flaky runs. Remove the second block.

Apply this diff:

-  describe('End-to-End Log Management Flow', () => {
-    let tempLogDir;
-    beforeAll(async () => {
-      tempLogDir = path.join(__dirname, '../../../temp-test-logs');
-      await fs.ensureDir(tempLogDir);
-      process.env.LOG_DIR = tempLogDir;
-    });
-    afterAll(async () => {
-      // Clean up temp directory (Issue #618 - use Node's built-in fs/promises.rm)
-      await rm(tempLogDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
-    });
-    test('should perform complete backup and cleanup cycle', async () => {
-      const logFiles = ['application.log','error.log','integration.log'];
-      for (const logFile of logFiles) {
-        const filePath = path.join(tempLogDir, logFile);
-        await fs.writeFile(filePath, `Test log content for ${logFile}\n`.repeat(100));
-      }
-      const backupResult = execSync(`node ${CLI_PATH} backup --days 1 --dry-run --format json`, { encoding: 'utf8', timeout: TEST_TIMEOUT });
-      const backupOutput = JSON.parse(backupResult);
-      expect(backupOutput.summary.totalUploaded).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      const cleanupResult = execSync(`node ${CLI_PATH} maintain cleanup --dry-run --format json`, { encoding: 'utf8', timeout: TEST_TIMEOUT });
-      const cleanupOutput = JSON.parse(cleanupResult);
-      expect(cleanupOutput).toHaveProperty('filesRemoved');
-      const healthResult = execSync(`node ${CLI_PATH} maintain health --format json`, { encoding: 'utf8', timeout: TEST_TIMEOUT });
-      const healthOutput = JSON.parse(healthResult);
-      expect(healthOutput.status).toMatch(/healthy|warning/);
-      expect(healthOutput.statistics).toHaveProperty('totalSize');
-    }, TEST_TIMEOUT * 2);
-  });

Also applies to: 373-447

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (1)

343-346: Fix brittle length assertions (off-by-one).

'Stored roast content' length is 20 (including spaces), not 19. Hardcoding exact lengths is brittle; compute from mock or assert type/range instead.

Apply one of:

• Correct values:

-          storedContentLength: 19,
+          storedContentLength: 20,

• Or compute from the mocked data:

-          storedContentLength: 19,
+          storedContentLength: mockQueries.roasts.data.content.length,

• Or relax to presence/range checks to avoid coupling to formatting.

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (1)

27-33: Fix incorrect mock path for mockMode.

Path should mirror other imports (../../src/...). Current ../src/... will fail resolution from tests/integration/.

Apply this diff:

-jest.mock('../src/config/mockMode', () => ({
+jest.mock('../../src/config/mockMode', () => ({
   mockMode: {
     isMockMode: true,
     generateMockSupabaseClient: jest.fn(),
     generateMockOpenAI: jest.fn()
   }
 }));

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (1)

11-19: Helper function duplicated across files (acknowledged as deferred).

The isFlagEnabled helper is duplicated from src/routes/roast.js. This is documented as L1 (deferred refactor) in the review verification. Consider extracting to a shared utility module in a future PR.

tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (1)

18-19: Quote CLI_PATH or switch to execFileSync to avoid path issues.

Unquoted paths in exec/spawn break on paths with spaces. Prefer execFileSync/spawn with args or at least quote CLI_PATH where used.

Example refactor:

-const { execSync, spawn } = require('child_process');
+const { execSync, execFileSync, spawn } = require('child_process');

-const result = execSync(`node ${CLI_PATH} backup --days 1 --dry-run`, { encoding: 'utf8', timeout: TEST_TIMEOUT });
+const result = execFileSync('node', [CLI_PATH, 'backup', '--days', '1', '--dry-run'], { encoding: 'utf8', timeout: TEST_TIMEOUT });

If keeping execSync strings, use: execSync(\node "${CLI_PATH}" ...`)`.
Also consider using the global CLI_PATH from tests/integration/cli/setup.js to avoid drift.

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (1)

540-556: Restore global.fetch after tests to avoid cross-test bleed.

Save original fetch and restore in afterAll.

 let originalFetch;
 beforeAll(() => { originalFetch = global.fetch; });
 afterAll(() => { global.fetch = originalFetch; });

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6453fcc and 228b873.

📒 Files selected for processing (16)

• docs/patterns/coderabbit-lessons.md (4 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-2.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/SUMMARY.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/verification.txt (1 hunks)
• src/services/PersonaService.js (1 hunks)
• src/services/perspectiveService.js (5 hunks)
• tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (1 hunks)
• tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (3 hunks)
• tests/integration/cli/setup.js (2 hunks)
• tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (1 hunks)
• tests/integration/roast.test.js (2 hunks)
• tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (1 hunks)
• tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (1 hunks)
• tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (1 hunks)
• tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (1 hunks)
• tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (6)

docs/test-evidence/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

For UI/frontend changes, include visual evidence (screenshots and report) under docs/test-evidence/

Files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/verification.txt
• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-2.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/SUMMARY.md

src/**/*.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.js: Use utils/logger.js for logging; do not use console.log in application code
Do not hardcode credentials or tokens; use environment variables for secrets

Files:

• src/services/perspectiveService.js
• src/services/PersonaService.js

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

docs/**/*.md: Do not include example environment variable values in public docs; instead write '🔐 Requires environment variables'
Never expose secrets, API keys, tokens, or .env variable names in receipts or public documentation

Files:

• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-2.md
• docs/patterns/coderabbit-lessons.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/SUMMARY.md

tests/integration/*.test.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Create an integration test file per platform named .test.js under tests/integration/

Files:

• tests/integration/roast.test.js
• tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js
• tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js
• tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.test.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

All new code must be accompanied by unit and/or integration tests using *.test.js naming under tests/unit or tests/integration

Files:

• tests/integration/roast.test.js
• tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js
• tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js
• tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js
• tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js

src/services/PersonaService.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Persona API operations must go through src/services/PersonaService.js (do not access encrypted persona fields directly)

Files:

• src/services/PersonaService.js

🧠 Learnings (2)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T22:36:58.514Z
Learning: Issue #371 (SPEC 15 — Backoffice MVP) is complete: global thresholds + aggressiveness, feature flags (shop_enabled, roast_versions, review_queue), per-network healthcheck with storage and UI, admin audit logs with CSV/JSON export, and GDPR-safe backoffice. Key files: frontend/src/pages/admin/BackofficeSettings.jsx, src/routes/admin/backofficeSettings.js, src/routes/admin/featureFlags.js, migrations 022_backoffice_mvp_spec15.sql and add_feature_flags_and_audit_system.sql, tests under tests/(unit|integration|smoke)/backoffice*.

📚 Learning: 2025-10-01T13:52:42.045Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-01T13:52:42.045Z
Learning: Issue #406 (Integración Ingestor - deduplicación, orden, backoff, ack) VERIFICACIÓN FINAL 01/10/2025: IMPLEMENTACIÓN COMPLETA AL 100% (5/5 elementos). Exponential backoff implementado en BaseWorker.js línea 409-418 con Math.pow(2, attempt-1). Clasificación de errores transitorios vs permanentes implementada en BaseWorker.js línea 363-404 con isRetryableError(). Issue cerrada. Validación de tests pendiente (archivos existen en tests/integration/ingestor-*.test.js pero no ejecutados).

Applied to files:

• docs/patterns/coderabbit-lessons.md

🧬 Code graph analysis (11)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (2)

src/routes/roast.js (1)

• isFlagEnabled (51-58)

src/config/flags.js (1)

• flags (311-311)

tests/integration/roast.test.js (2)

src/routes/roast.js (9)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (24-33)
• require (37-37)
• require (38-38)
• require (41-41)
• require (295-295)
• platform (1223-1223)

src/index.js (4)

• require (27-36)
• require (37-37)
• require (44-44)
• app (74-74)

tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (1)

tests/integration/cli/setup.js (1)

• require (9-9)

tests/integration/cli/setup.js (1)

tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (3)

• require (12-12)
• require (15-15)
• path (13-13)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (3)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (4)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (2)

• require (2-2)
• require (5-5)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (6)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (1)

• require (2-2)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (4)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (3)

• require (13-13)
• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (6)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (2)

• require (2-2)
• require (5-5)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (4)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (1)

• require (13-13)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (6)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (4)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (1)

• require (13-13)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (6)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (1)

• require (2-2)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (4)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (3)

• require (13-13)
• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (6)

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (3)

• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (21-21)

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (1)

• require (2-2)

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (3)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (4)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (12-12)

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/SUMMARY.md

[style] ~94-~94: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...tes during PR evolution - Issues may be fixed in later commits before implementation ...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

---

[grammar] ~137-~137: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...not toContain) - ✅ Exception: Rate limiting scenarios need conditional logi...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: test_core (adapters)
• GitHub Check: test_core (tier-validation)
• GitHub Check: test_core (idempotency)
• GitHub Check: test_core (e2e-scenarios)
• GitHub Check: Security Audit
• GitHub Check: lint-check

🔇 Additional comments (19)

src/services/PersonaService.js (1)

23-23: LGTM! Jest compatibility fix applied correctly.

The destructured import aligns with the Jest mock structure and resolves the "logger.info is not a function" error documented in Pattern #10.

Based on learnings

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-2.md (1)

1-86: Excellent test session documentation.

Clear documentation of systematic test fixes with before/after metrics, patterns discovered, and lessons learned. The checkpoint format provides good traceability.

docs/patterns/coderabbit-lessons.md (1)

385-614: Well-documented patterns from test fixing sessions.

The new patterns (#9 and #10) provide clear examples, prevention checklists, and impact metrics. The progression from mistake to fix with code examples makes these lessons actionable.

src/services/perspectiveService.js (2)

32-37: Good defensive guard for test environment compatibility.

Checking for google.commentanalyzer availability before use prevents test failures in Jest environments where the Google API client may not be available.

Based on learnings

---

83-89: Excellent GDPR-compliant logging fix.

Replacing direct text logging with a non-reversible SHA-256 hash maintains debuggability while preventing PII exposure in logs.

docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/verification.txt (1)

1-150: Comprehensive verification evidence.

The verification steps clearly document the GDPR fix with before/after checks and test results. The risk assessment and compliance checklist provide good traceability.

docs/test-evidence/review-3357562417/SUMMARY.md (1)

1-237: Thorough pattern analysis and process documentation.

The pattern-focused summary provides excellent categorization of issues, decision rationale, and lessons learned. The before/after comparisons and decision matrix are particularly valuable for future reference.

tests/qa/webhook-tests.js (1)

13-13: Import pattern updated consistently.

The change to a named export aligns with the broader migration across test files (webhook-tests.js, oauth-integration-tests.js, styleProfileWorkflow.test.js, etc.) to consume app as a named export from src/index.

tests/integration/styleProfileWorkflow.test.js (1)

2-2: Import pattern updated consistently.

The change to import app as a named export is consistent with the test file migration pattern seen across multiple files in this PR.

tests/integration/cli/logCommands.test.js (2)

386-388: Cleanup via fs.promises.rm looks good.

The switch to rm with recursive+force is correct and aligns with setup teardown changes.

Ensure tempLogDir is always defined before teardown runs to avoid benign warnings when path never got created.

Also applies to: 462-464

---

15-16: Let me verify the minimum Node version requirement for fs.promises.rm:

Verified: fs.promises.rm support confirmed.

fs.promises.rm was added in Node.js v14.14.0, matching the review comment's specification. The sandbox runtime (v24.3.0) fully supports this API.

However, the package.json does not declare engines.node to enforce this minimum version requirement. While the code will run fine in the current environment, developers using this package in CI/runtime environments with older Node versions (pre-14.14.0) would encounter failures. Consider adding "engines": { "node": ">=14.14.0" } to package.json to explicitly declare the runtime requirement.

tests/integration/autoApprovalSecurityV2.test.js (2)

14-15: Named export import of app looks good.

---

14-15: No issues found. The export is correctly structured.

The verification confirms that src/index.js at line 901 exports { app, server }, which properly supports the destructuring import const { app } = require('../../src/index'); used in the test file. The import style matches the export structure.

tests/integration/multiTenantWorkflowComplete.test.js (1)

14-15: Named export import of app looks good.

tests/qa/oauth-integration-tests.js (1)

10-11: Named export import of app looks good.

tests/qa/payload-processing-tests.js (1)

10-11: Named export import of app looks good.

tests/qa/token-management-tests.js (1)

9-10: Named export import of app looks good.

tests/integration/roast.test.js (1)

17-23: Solid end-to-end coverage for production-mock flow.

Good validations of schema, credits, auth, platforms, and resilience paths. Nothing blocking.

Also applies to: 34-65, 111-129, 130-146, 147-163, 181-194, 198-216, 236-247, 249-256, 258-293, 295-307, 308-329, 332-347, 351-403

tests/integration/cli/setup.js (1)

9-14: No changes required; fs.promises.rm is compatible with project's Node version constraints.

fs.promises.rm was added in Node.js v14.14.0, and the project enforces Node 20 across all CI workflows. The codebase targets Node 20 and Node 18 (both well above the minimum), so using fs.promises.rm is safe and does not require fallback to fs-extra.remove.

While documenting Node engine constraints in package.json would be a best practice, the existing CI/CD enforcement is sufficient to guarantee compatibility.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-008.json (1)

1-30: Add missing newline at end of file.

The file is missing a trailing newline, which is a standard convention for text files.

Apply this diff:

   "notes": "Auto-approved"
 }
+

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-028.json (1)

1-24: Add trailing newline to JSON file.

As noted in the file summary, this JSON file is missing a trailing newline, which is a common file hygiene best practice for source and configuration files.

Apply this change to add a trailing newline:

   "notes": "Auto-approved"
 }
+

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md (1)

152-152: Minor grammar refinement: compound adjective.

Line 152 reads "Production impact: Potential (changes rate limiting behavior)". If "production impact" is intended as a compound adjective modifying a noun, use a hyphen: "production-impact". Otherwise, the phrasing is acceptable as-is.

No change required if the current style is intentional; this is a style preference.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-011.json (1)

23-24: Add trailing newline to comply with POSIX standards.

JSON and configuration files should end with a newline character. This is a minor formatting issue but aligns with best practices and linting standards.

Apply this diff:

   "notes": "Auto-approved"
-}
+}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 228b873 and a141d61.

📒 Files selected for processing (40)

• .gdd-backups/.gdd-test-security.txt.2025-10-13T15-09-13-810Z.backup (0 hunks)
• docs/guardian/audit-log.md (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-938.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-939.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-941.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-008.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-010.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-011.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-869.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-870.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-871.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-258.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-259.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-263.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-653.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-655.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-656.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-026.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-027.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-028.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-787.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-788.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-789.json (1 hunks)
• docs/guardian/guardian-report.md (1 hunks)
• docs/plan/review-3358102684.md (1 hunks)
• docs/system-validation.md (2 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md (1 hunks)
• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/verification.txt (1 hunks)
• gdd-status.json (1 hunks)
• gdd-write-signatures.json (1 hunks)
• src/middleware/adminRateLimiter.js (2 hunks)
• src/middleware/inputValidation.js (2 hunks)
• src/middleware/security.js (4 hunks)
• src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js (2 hunks)
• src/routes/roast.js (5 hunks)
• src/routes/shield.js (2 hunks)
• src/routes/triage.js (3 hunks)
• src/services/perspectiveService.js (3 hunks)
• src/utils/featureFlags.js (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .gdd-backups/.gdd-test-security.txt.2025-10-13T15-09-13-810Z.backup

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-938.json

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)

• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-027.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-871.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-653.json
• src/utils/featureFlags.js
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-263.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-010.json
• src/routes/shield.js
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-939.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-258.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-656.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-25-36-259.json
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-026.json
• docs/guardian/guardian-report.md
• docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-869.json

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (4)

src/**/*.js

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.js: Use utils/logger.js for logging; do not use console.log in application code
Do not hardcode credentials or tokens; use environment variables for secrets

Files:

• src/routes/roast.js
• src/middleware/inputValidation.js
• src/middleware/security.js
• src/services/perspectiveService.js
• src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js
• src/routes/triage.js
• src/middleware/adminRateLimiter.js

docs/test-evidence/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

For UI/frontend changes, include visual evidence (screenshots and report) under docs/test-evidence/

Files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/verification.txt
• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

docs/**/*.md: Do not include example environment variable values in public docs; instead write '🔐 Requires environment variables'
Never expose secrets, API keys, tokens, or .env variable names in receipts or public documentation

Files:

• docs/system-validation.md
• docs/plan/review-3358102684.md
• docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md
• docs/guardian/audit-log.md
• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md

docs/plan/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

For issues meeting thresholds (AC ≥3 or multi-area), create a mini-plan in docs/plan/.md before implementation

Files:

• docs/plan/review-3358102684.md

🧠 Learnings (3)

📚 Learning: 2025-09-25T22:36:58.514Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T22:36:58.514Z
Learning: Issue #371 (SPEC 15 — Backoffice MVP) is complete: global thresholds + aggressiveness, feature flags (shop_enabled, roast_versions, review_queue), per-network healthcheck with storage and UI, admin audit logs with CSV/JSON export, and GDPR-safe backoffice. Key files: frontend/src/pages/admin/BackofficeSettings.jsx, src/routes/admin/backofficeSettings.js, src/routes/admin/featureFlags.js, migrations 022_backoffice_mvp_spec15.sql and add_feature_flags_and_audit_system.sql, tests under tests/(unit|integration|smoke)/backoffice*.

Applied to files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/verification.txt

📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z
Learning: Issue #401 (SPEC 11 UI MVP QA Final Polish) VERIFICACIÓN FINAL 27/09/2025: COMPLETA AL 100%. Los 3 elementos implementados exitosamente: (1) GDPR copy "Los roasts autopublicados llevan firma de IA" en AjustesSettings.jsx línea 662, (2) Shield tab gating implementado, (3) Límites globales por plan implementados - isPlatformAtLimit removido completamente, migración a useSocialAccounts exitosa. Issue lista para cerrar.

Applied to files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md

📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z

Learnt from: Eibon7
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T23:41:18.105Z
Learning: Issue #401 (SPEC 11 UI MVP QA Final Polish) VERIFICACIÓN DEFINITIVA 27/09/2025: COMPLETA AL 100%. Los 3 elementos implementados correctamente: (1) Shield tab gating con ENABLE_SHIELD_UI en Settings.jsx línea 735, (2) GDPR copy exacto "Los roasts autopublicados llevan firma de IA" en AjustesSettings.jsx línea 662, (3) Límites globales por plan COMPLETAMENTE MIGRADOS - isPlatformAtLimit eliminado, useSocialAccounts hook implementado con lógica maxConnections = planTier === 'free' ? 1 : 2 en dashboard.jsx línea 280. Issue lista para cerrar definitivamente.

Applied to files:

• docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md

🧬 Code graph analysis (6)

src/routes/roast.js (3)

src/routes/dashboard.js (1)

• require (9-9)

src/index.js (3)

• require (27-36)
• require (37-37)
• require (44-44)

src/services/roastEngine.js (4)

• require (13-13)
• require (14-14)
• require (15-15)
• require (18-18)

src/middleware/inputValidation.js (4)

src/middleware/security.js (2)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)

src/routes/shield.js (8)

• require (13-13)
• require (15-15)
• require (16-16)
• require (17-17)
• require (18-18)
• req (356-356)
• req (357-357)
• req (524-524)

src/routes/triage.js (12)

• require (4-4)
• require (5-5)
• require (7-7)
• req (83-83)
• req (84-84)
• req (249-249)
• req (250-250)
• req (349-349)
• req (350-350)
• req (522-522)
• ip (37-37)
• ip (54-54)

src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js (1)

• ip (48-48)

src/middleware/security.js (4)

src/middleware/inputValidation.js (4)

• require (20-20)
• require (21-21)
• require (23-23)
• require (24-24)

src/routes/shield.js (5)

• require (13-13)
• require (15-15)
• require (16-16)
• require (17-17)
• require (18-18)

src/routes/triage.js (3)

• require (4-4)
• require (5-5)
• require (7-7)

src/index.js (4)

• require (27-36)
• require (37-37)
• require (44-44)
• require (72-72)

src/services/perspectiveService.js (3)

src/routes/roast.js (8)

• require (9-9)
• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)
• require (24-33)
• require (37-37)
• require (38-38)
• require (41-41)
• require (284-284)

src/routes/dashboard.js (1)

• require (9-9)

src/index.js (5)

• require (27-36)
• require (37-37)
• require (44-44)
• require (72-72)
• require (359-359)

src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js (2)

src/middleware/inputValidation.js (1)

• require (20-20)

src/middleware/adminRateLimiter.js (3)

• require (2-2)
• require (3-3)
• require (4-4)

src/routes/triage.js (3)

src/middleware/inputValidation.js (4)

• require (20-20)
• require (21-21)
• require (23-23)
• require (24-24)

src/middleware/security.js (2)

• require (10-10)
• require (11-11)

src/routes/shield.js (8)

• require (13-13)
• require (15-15)
• require (16-16)
• require (17-17)
• require (18-18)
• req (356-356)
• req (357-357)
• req (524-524)

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/plan/review-3358102684.md

[style] ~227-~227: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...Note:** If batch error handling reveals deeper issues, may invoke Test Engineer Agent ...

(DEEP_PROFOUND)

---

[grammar] ~362-~362: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...les --- ## 7. Risk Assessment ### Low Risk Items N2 (Extract Helper): - *...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

---

[grammar] ~374-~374: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...sults, manual verification ### Very Low Risk Items C1 (Privacy): - **Risk:*...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

---

[uncategorized] ~470-~470: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...eason:** Optional cosmetic improvement, low value - Impact: None (tests work fine wit...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md

[uncategorized] ~152-~152: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...Production impact:** Potential (changes rate limiting behavior) --- ## ✅ Session #3 Summary...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/plan/review-3358102684.md

5-5: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

---

241-241: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

288-288: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

295-295: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

464-464: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

469-469: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

474-474: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

493-493: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md

87-87: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

93-93: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

109-109: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

115-115: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

120-120: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

176-176: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

182-182: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md

3-3: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Lint and Test
• GitHub Check: validate_coverage

🔇 Additional comments (23)

gdd-status.json (1)

2-2: Timestamp update aligns with doc sync protocol completion.

The timestamp reflects the GDD validation cycle's completion as part of the 7-phase documentation sync protocol. All health metrics remain consistent (15 nodes validated, 0 drift, healthy status).

Confirm the timestamp (2025-10-21T07:02:57.969Z) reflects the actual completion of all 7 protocol phases. The timestamp should fall between PR #575 merge (2025-10-20T17:24:37Z) and this PR creation (2025-10-20T18:19:14Z)—note the date shift to 2025-10-21 appears to indicate a timezone or scheduling difference. Please verify this is intentional.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-008.json (1)

27-29: Verify the semantics of approved_by: null for auto-approved cases.

The approved_by field is null while action is "APPROVED" and notes indicate "Auto-approved". Confirm whether this represents an auto-approval system (where null indicates system-driven approval rather than human approval) or if it should be populated with a system user identifier or bot name.

If null is intentional for auto-approvals, consider adding a brief comment or clarification in the Guardian case schema documentation to explain this pattern for future maintainers.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-27-07-028.json (1)

1-24: Guardian case structure looks appropriate.

The JSON structure is syntactically valid and semantically consistent:

• case_id timestamp-based and unique
• Violations count (1 safe) aligns with severity level (SAFE)
• Action (APPROVED) and approval_required (false) are appropriate for auto-approved safe cases
• approved_by is correctly null for auto-approval
• files_changed and details array are properly aligned around test.js
• Metadata fields (actor, timestamp, domains) are well-populated

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-21-37-941.json (1)

1-24: Verify the scope and necessity of this Guardian case artifact.

This JSON file is a Guardian case record (audit/evidence artifact) being added to the documentation directory. However, the PR objectives state the sync decision is "no updates needed" for the post-merge documentation synchronization. This artifact file appears inconsistent with the stated scope:

• PR summary: "Sync decision: no updates needed"
• Files added mentioned: docs/sync-reports/pr-575-sync.md (the sync analysis report)
• This Guardian case file: Not mentioned in objectives, appears to be an artifact rather than documentation content

The JSON structure is valid and the data is logically sound (SAFE severity, auto-approved), but clarification is needed on whether this artifact should be version-controlled as part of a documentation sync PR or if it was included unintentionally.

docs/guardian/audit-log.md (1)

63-80: LGTM — demo fixture data correctly formatted and integrated.

The new audit log entries (lines 63–80) follow the established table format, maintain consistency with existing entries, and introduce no security or PII concerns. The synthetic data aligns with the PR's stated purpose of post-merge documentation synchronization for a demo-fixtures feature branch.

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md (1)

1-191: ✅ Test evidence documentation is well-structured and accurate.

The checkpoint documentation effectively captures:

• Clear problem statements and fixes for CLI path corrections and deprecated fs.remove replacements
• Quantifiable results (8 errors eliminated, 60 lines removed)
• Root-cause analysis for newly discovered errors
• Actionable next steps with scope considerations
• No exposed secrets, API keys, or sensitive environment variables

The content supports the broader PR objective of documenting test-fixing sessions.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-011.json (1)

1-24: ** – Guardian case is stale/invalid; remove from PR**

The Guardian case file docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-22-55-011.json records changes to test.js, which does not appear in the actual PR changes. The actual PR contains 59 file changes (31 added, 28 modified) across multiple source and test files, including src/utils/featureFlags.js, several rate limiters, middleware, and integration tests—none of which are test.js at the root level.

The real issue: The PR objectives are misleading. They claim "no updates needed" but the PR actually contains substantial changes to feature flags, rate-limiting middleware (roastRateLimiter, adminRateLimiter), middleware, and services. The AI summary is actually more accurate in describing these changes than the stated PR objectives.

Actions:

• Remove or correct the Guardian case file (it documents non-existent changes)
• Update PR objectives to accurately reflect the 59-file scope of this PR
• The concerns in the original review comment are invalid because they're based on the incorrect Guardian case content

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-787.json (1)

1-30: Verify this Guardian case is production data and not documentation artifact.

This file adds a Guardian case record for test.js (SAFE, auto-approved). However, the PR objective states "no updates needed" for documentation sync — clarify whether these Guardian case JSON files are intended as audit/evidence artifacts from the referenced PR #575 or are part of the PR's own approval workflow.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-24-14-870.json (1)

1-30: Review comment verified; duplication pattern confirmed across all three Guardian cases.

All facts in the original review comment are accurate. The three case files (655, 870, 788) exist and contain identical metadata and violation metrics for src/services/costControl.js. The only differences are case IDs and timestamps (22:24:14, 22:26:35, and 07:12:43 UTC across two days). The costControl.js file exists and contains legitimate service code.

The data integrity concern is valid—whether these represent system-generated duplicates or separate flagged attempts at different times, the presence of multiple identical unapproved cases for the same file/domain creates ambiguity about actual approval status and merge eligibility.

The recommendation to consolidate the cases or provide evidence of distinct incidents requiring separate tracking remains actionable and necessary.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-20-22-26-35-655.json (1)

1-30: Review comment is based on a misunderstanding of Guardian system design.

The three case files are not accidental duplicates—they represent the systematic, intentional tracking pattern used by Guardian. Examination of the entire docs/guardian/cases/ directory shows that nearly every timestamp generates multiple associated case files (e.g., 2025-10-20-22-21-37 creates three files with suffixes -938, -939, -941).

The identical metrics across these cases reflect the expected behavior of monitoring the same violation across different check intervals or cycles, not a race condition or automation error. Timestamps are deliberately spaced (2 minutes and 8+ hours apart), not concurrent.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-788.json (1)

1-30: CRITICAL BLOCKED case remains unapproved; verify merge eligibility.

This Guardian case documents a CRITICAL change to src/services/costControl.js (pricing domain) in BLOCKED state with approval_required: true and approved_by: null. Merging code while a critical governance case remains unapproved may violate your approval workflow. Additionally, this entry has identical metrics and content to other costControl.js CRITICAL BLOCKED cases (2025-10-20-22-26-35-655 and 2025-10-20-22-24-14-870), indicating either duplicate case creation or a data quality issue in the Guardian system.

Clarify:

1. Should unapproved CRITICAL BLOCKED cases be included in this PR?
2. Are the multiple identical CRITICAL cases (788, 655, 870) legitimate separate incidents or unintended duplicates?

src/routes/triage.js (1)

7-7: LGTM: IPv6 support properly implemented for rate limiters.

The changes correctly adopt ipKeyGenerator from express-rate-limit v8.x to handle IPv6 addresses. Both rate limiters maintain their composite key strategy (organization ID with IP fallback) while gaining IPv6 subnet normalization.

Note: Express-rate-limit v8.0.0 introduced a breaking change where IPv6 addresses are now masked to /56 subnets by default. This means IPv6 clients from the same subnet will share rate limits. If your application requires per-address IPv6 limits, consider setting the ipv6Subnet option to a higher value (e.g., 60 or 64) in the rate limiter configuration.

Based on learnings

Verify that /56 subnet grouping for IPv6 is acceptable for your triage rate limiting requirements. If you need finer granularity for IPv6 addresses, add the ipv6Subnet option:

const triageRateLimit = rateLimit({
  // ... existing config ...
  ipv6Subnet: 64, // More granular IPv6 grouping if needed
  keyGenerator: (req) => {
    const ip = ipKeyGenerator(req);
    return `triage_${req.organization?.id || ip}`;
  }
});

Also applies to: 34-40, 52-57

src/middleware/inputValidation.js (1)

20-20: LGTM: IPv6-aware composite key generation implemented correctly.

The rate limiter now uses ipKeyGenerator to normalize IPv6 addresses while maintaining the composite key strategy (IP + user ID). This approach provides effective rate limiting for both authenticated users and anonymous requests.

Implementation highlights:

• IPv6 addresses are normalized to /56 subnets (default behavior)
• Authenticated requests: keyed by IP + user ID
• Anonymous requests: keyed by IP + 'anonymous'

The composite key pattern prevents authenticated users from different IPs from sharing limits, while still grouping anonymous requests from the same IP/subnet appropriately.

Based on learnings

Also applies to: 56-85

src/middleware/webhookSecurity.js (1)

21-21: LGTM: IPv6 support correctly integrated into webhook rate limiting.

The changes properly adopt ipKeyGenerator while maintaining the webhook source detection logic. The composite key (webhook:${ip}:${source}) provides effective rate limiting per IP and webhook provider.

Source detection:

• Stripe webhooks: identified via stripe-signature header
• GitHub webhooks: identified via x-hub-signature-256 header
• Unknown sources: fallback category

IPv6 addresses are normalized to /56 subnets by default, which is appropriate for webhook rate limiting to prevent subnet-based bypass attempts.

Based on learnings

Also applies to: 43-69

src/middleware/adminRateLimiter.js (1)

2-2: LGTM: IPv6 support integrated with user-first rate limiting strategy.

The changes correctly prioritize user-based rate limiting over IP-based limits for authenticated requests, with proper IPv6 handling for unauthenticated fallback.

Key generation strategy:

• Authenticated: user:${req.user.id} (IP-independent)
• Unauthenticated: ip:${ipKeyGenerator(req)} (IPv6-aware)

This approach ensures that admin users are tracked consistently across IPs, while unauthenticated admin access attempts are properly rate-limited with IPv6 subnet normalization.

Based on learnings

Also applies to: 39-45

src/middleware/security.js (1)

10-10: LGTM: Clean IPv6 support implementation across security rate limiters.

The changes adopt the simplest pattern by directly assigning ipKeyGenerator as the keyGenerator for all three rate limiters. This provides consistent IPv6 handling across general, authentication, and billing endpoints.

Rate limiters updated:

• generalRateLimit: 100 requests per 15 minutes per IP/subnet
• authRateLimit: 10 auth requests per 15 minutes per IP/subnet
• billingRateLimit: 20 billing requests per 15 minutes per IP/subnet

All three now normalize IPv6 addresses to /56 subnets by default, which provides effective rate limiting while preventing subnet-based bypass attempts.

Based on learnings

Also applies to: 70-93, 98-120, 125-146

gdd-write-signatures.json (1)

1-1961: Test data expansion - no code review needed.

This file contains test/audit signature data that has been expanded from 94 to 159 entries. As this is purely data (test signatures, backup paths, timestamps), no code logic review is required.

docs/system-validation.md (1)

3-3: Documentation timestamp update.

Standard validation report refresh with updated timestamp and validation time. No issues.

Also applies to: 77-77

docs/plan/review-3358102684.md (1)

1-503: Comprehensive review implementation plan.

This document provides a thorough analysis and implementation strategy for addressing CodeRabbit review findings. The plan appropriately identifies that one issue (C1 - privacy risk) was pre-resolved in a previous commit, and outlines refactoring work for duplicate code elimination and improved error handling.

Key elements:

• Severity analysis with clear prioritization
• GDD node impact assessment
• Phased implementation strategy with commit plan
• Pattern recognition (Cherry-Pick Intermediate State Reviews)
• Comprehensive acceptance criteria and risk assessment

The structured approach with verification steps and testing plan demonstrates good software engineering practices.

src/services/perspectiveService.js (2)

209-224: Excellent improvement - Promise.allSettled preserves successful results.

The refactoring from Promise.all to Promise.allSettled is a solid reliability improvement. The per-item error logging with batch and item indices provides better debuggability compared to the previous all-or-nothing approach.

---

22-27: Current approach is sufficiently robust.

The check !google || typeof google.commentanalyzer !== 'function' is actually more defensive than other googleapis usage patterns in the codebase. It verifies both client existence and method availability before instantiation, which is appropriate since commentanalyzer and youtube may have different availability in test/mock environments. The code is properly wrapped in try-catch, and the conditional gracefully disables the feature if unavailable.

src/routes/roast.js (1)

11-11: LGTM - Consistent feature flag migration with proper fallbacks.

The migration to isFlagEnabled is correctly implemented with appropriate try/catch guards and fallback initialization logic for each service. The pattern is consistent with the changes in perspectiveService.js.

The else branches (lines 58-61, 73-76, 87-90) properly initialize fallbacks when flags are disabled, maintaining backward compatibility.

Note: The broader codebase migration consistency concern has been flagged in the perspectiveService.js review.

Also applies to: 50-61, 64-76, 79-90

docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/verification.txt (1)

1-315: Excellent verification documentation.

The verification evidence is comprehensive and well-structured:

• Clear test results (62/62 passing)
• Concrete verification commands with expected outputs
• Pattern-based analysis with proper attribution to specific commits
• GDPR compliance verification
• Risk assessment and impact analysis

The documentation provides a strong audit trail for the changes and follows documentation best practices.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Missing required fields in details object; schema inconsistency with parallel SAFE entry.

The details object is incomplete compared to the SAFE entry in 2025-10-21-07-12-43-787.json. This entry omits:

• domains array (should contain "test" based on violation context)
• severity field (should be "SAFE")
• lines_added and lines_removed (should match the 5 added, 2 removed pattern)

Verify whether this is intentional truncation or incomplete data capture, and ensure schema consistency across all Guardian case records.

---

I'll verify the review comment by examining the actual Guardian case files to validate the schema comparison claim.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine both Guardian case files to compare schema structure
echo "=== File 1: 2025-10-21-07-12-43-789.json ==="
cat docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-789.json 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

echo ""
echo "=== File 2: 2025-10-21-07-12-43-787.json (comparison target) ==="
cat docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-787.json 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

echo ""
echo "=== List all Guardian case files ==="
ls -la docs/guardian/cases/ 2>/dev/null | head -20 || echo "Directory not found"

Length of output: 2559

---

I can confirm the review comment's observation is accurate. Let me check for schema documentation and patterns across more case files to determine if this is intentional or an error.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Guardian schema definition or documentation
echo "=== Searching for schema or requirements documentation ==="
find docs -name "*schema*" -o -name "*guardian*" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo ""
echo "=== Checking for schema definitions in README or config ==="
grep -r "details\|schema\|Guardian" docs/ --include="*.md" --include="*.json" 2>/dev/null | grep -i "schema\|required\|field" | head -10

echo ""
echo "=== Sampling details from multiple case files ==="
for file in docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-09-16-37-00-742.json docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-09-16-37-00-744.json docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-09-17-11-10-814.json; do
  echo "File: $file"
  jq '.details' "$file" 2>/dev/null || echo "N/A"
  echo ""
done

Length of output: 1772

---

Details object in 2025-10-21-07-12-43-789.json is incomplete; missing required fields present in all other Guardian case records.

Analysis of multiple Guardian case files confirms a consistent schema pattern. The details array in all sampled cases (742, 744, 814, and 787) contains: file, domains, severity, lines_added, and lines_removed.

File 789.json violates this pattern by including only the file field in its details object. Given that this same file contains the required data at the top level (domains: [], severity: "SAFE", and violations tracking), the missing nested fields appear to be incomplete data capture rather than intentional omission.

Add the following fields to the details object in line 18-20:

• "domains": []
• "severity": "SAFE"
• "lines_added": <value>
• "lines_removed": <value>

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-21-07-12-43-789.json around lines 16 to 20, the
details object only contains "file" but must include the same schema used by
other cases; update the details object to add "domains": [] and "severity":
"SAFE", and populate "lines_added" and "lines_removed" with the corresponding
values from this file’s top-level data (or set them to 0 if no top-level values
exist), ensuring the details object matches the pattern from cases
742/744/814/787.

[coderabbitai]

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

Specify language for fenced code blocks (MD040).

Add a language identifier to all code blocks to improve readability and enable syntax highlighting.

Apply this diff to add language specifications:

- ```diff
+ ```diff
- ```
+ ```

  (Repeat for all fenced code blocks)

Specifically for lines 87–89 (shell output) and 93–95 (shell output), mark as ```text or ```sh. Line 134 should be ```bash.

Also applies to: 49-54, 87-89, 93-95, 134-136

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md lines 30-33 (and also apply to
ranges 49-54, 87-89, 93-95, 134-136): fenced code blocks lack language
identifiers; update each triple-backtick block to include the appropriate
language tag (e.g., ```js for JavaScript, ```sh or ```text for shell output,
```bash where specified) so that lines 87–89 and 93–95 are marked as ```text or
```sh and line 134 is marked as ```bash; ensure every fenced block in the file
is updated consistently with the correct language label.

[coderabbitai]

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

Replace emphasis with proper markdown headings (MD036).

Lines 109, 115, 120, 176, and 182 use emphasis (**...**) instead of headings. Convert these to level 3 or 4 headings (### or ####) for proper document structure and navigation.

Apply this diff:

- **1. JSON Parse Errors (multiple)**
+ ### 1. JSON Parse Errors (multiple)

- **2. Test Timeouts (3 occurrences)**
+ ### 2. Test Timeouts (3 occurrences)

- **3. Expected substring not found**
+ ### 3. Expected substring not found

- **Option A: Continue with IPv6/Trust Proxy Fix**
+ ### Option A: Continue with IPv6/Trust Proxy Fix

- **Option B: Focus on Other Jest Compatibility Issues**
+ ### Option B: Focus on Other Jest Compatibility Issues

Also applies to: 115-115, 120-120, 176-176, 182-182

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

109-109: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/test-evidence/issue-618/CHECKPOINT-3.md around lines 109, 115, 120, 176
and 182, several section titles currently use bold emphasis (**...**) instead of
proper Markdown headings; replace each bolded title with an appropriate level 3
or 4 heading (e.g., prepend ### or #### and remove the surrounding **), ensure a
blank line before and after each heading for correct rendering, and keep the
original text unchanged except for converting the emphasis to the heading
syntax.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix markdown formatting for the URL.

The bare URL should be wrapped in angle brackets or converted to a proper markdown link.

Apply this diff:

-**Review URL:** https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684
+**Review URL:** <https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684>

Or alternatively:

-**Review URL:** https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684
+**Review URL:** [Review #3358102684](https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684)

Based on coding guidelines.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	**Review URL:** https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684
	**Review URL:** <https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684>

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

3-3: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/test-evidence/review-3358102684/SUMMARY.md around line 3, the bare
review URL is not properly formatted in Markdown; wrap the URL in angle brackets
like <https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684>
or convert it to a markdown link with descriptive text (e.g., [Review on
GitHub](https://github.com/Eibon7/roastr-ai/pull/619#pullrequestreview-3358102684))
so it renders correctly.

[coderabbitai]

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

LGTM - Feature flag migration implemented correctly.

The migration to the centralized isFlagEnabled utility is correctly implemented in this file. The defensive checking and error handling align with the Jest compatibility requirements mentioned in the documentation.

However, based on the relevant code snippets, the migration appears incomplete:

• src/routes/dashboard.js (line 8) still uses const { flags } = require('../config/flags')
• src/index.js (line 36) still uses the old pattern
• src/services/roastEngine.js (line 13) still uses the old pattern

Verify that the feature flag migration is complete across the entire codebase:

Also applies to: 14-14, 250-250

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find files still using the old flags import pattern
echo "=== Files still importing flags directly ==="
rg -n "const.*flags.*=.*require.*config/flags" --type=js

echo -e "\n=== Files using new isFlagEnabled pattern ==="
rg -n "const.*isFlagEnabled.*=.*require.*featureFlags" --type=js

echo -e "\n=== Direct flags.isEnabled usage ==="
rg -n "flags\.isEnabled\(" --type=js -C2

Length of output: 81576

---

Feature flag migration in perspectiveService.js is correct; however, systematic migration across codebase is required.

The changes in this file correctly use the centralized isFlagEnabled utility. However, verification confirms the migration is incomplete:

• Old pattern (direct import from config/flags): ~80+ files in src/, including src/routes/dashboard.js, src/index.js, src/services/roastEngine.js, and others
• New pattern (centralized isFlagEnabled): Only src/services/perspectiveService.js and src/routes/roast.js

Both patterns are functionally equivalent, but the codebase needs a coordinated migration or explicit decision on which pattern to standardize. A systematic refactor should migrate remaining src/ files to use the centralized isFlagEnabled utility for consistency and maintainability.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/services/perspectiveService.js around line 9, the import was updated to
use the centralized isFlagEnabled utility but the rest of the codebase still
imports feature flags directly; perform a coordinated migration: search for all
files in src/ that import from config/flags (approx. 80+ files) and replace
those direct imports with calls to ../utils/featureFlags.isFlagEnabled (or the
correct relative path), update any call sites to use isFlagEnabled('FLAG_NAME')
instead of accessing flag constants, run tests and linting, and ensure the new
utility is exported and imported with correct relative paths and unit test
coverage for a few representative modules to validate behavior.

[Eibon7]

@coderabbitai can you review this PR?
1. ✅ Is it safe to merge?

Feel free to comment or request changes if anything’s missing or unclear.

[coderabbitai]

@Eibon7: I'll review this PR for you right away!

Looking at the PR, I notice that while it's titled as a "post-merge documentation sync," the changes include substantive code modifications beyond just documentation:

Code Changes I See:

• Security improvements (IPv6 support in rate limiters)
• Feature flag utility refactoring (new shared utility)
• Test infrastructure updates (import pattern changes)
• Multiple service and middleware modifications

Initial Assessment:

• ✅ GDD Health: 88.3/100 (good)
• ✅ Drift Risk: 6/100 (low)
• ✅ All 7 protocol phases completed
• ⚠️ Mixed documentation + code changes require careful review

I'm triggering a comprehensive review to ensure everything is safe to merge, especially since the learning indicates we should maintain 0 comments before merging. I'll examine the code changes, test coverage, and ensure all modifications are properly documented and safe.

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: CR
PR: Eibon7/roastr-ai#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-20T17:25:56.746Z
Learning: Maintain 0 comments from CodeRabbit before merging; address all suggestions before requesting merge

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[Eibon7]

Cerrando este PR porque mezcla dos scopes diferentes:

1. Issue test: PR 1.1 Partial - Testing Infrastructure Foundation & Planning #618: Test fixing (14 commits de Jest integration tests)
2. Post-merge sync PR feat(demo): Add fixtures and seeds for Demo Mode - Issue #420 #575: Documentación (1 commit)

Acción correctiva:

• Creando PR separado para Issue test: PR 1.1 Partial - Testing Infrastructure Foundation & Planning #618 con todos los test fixes
• Creando PR separado solo para documentación post-merge

Esto mantiene cada PR enfocado en un solo objetivo y facilita code review.

Ref: #618