Results on PC-459 #48
Description
I re-ran the code and obtained 17.9 mIoU on PC-459, which is higher than the 14.5 mIoU results reported in the paper. Has anyone else here had the same results?
{{ message }}
I re-ran the code and obtained 17.9 mIoU on PC-459, which is higher than the 14.5 mIoU results reported in the paper. Has anyone else here had the same results?