System VMs fail to start – “Unable to create a deployment for VM instance #11903
Unanswered
yann1ck-oder-so
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
|
@yann1ck-oder-so 'InsufficientServerCapacityException' is a generic error; there must be a specific error in the logs preceding this error. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I’m running a management server and currently have two KVM hosts, both on Ubuntu.
The basic configuration is complete, and both hosts are successfully added to the cluster.
The problem:
My System VMs (Console Proxy & Secondary Storage VM) won’t start.
In the CloudStack UI, the message just says “Could not be started.”
When checking the log (/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log), I get the following error:
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
Unable to create a deployment for VM instance {"id":852,"instanceName":"s-852-VM","state":"Starting","type":"SecondaryStorageVm","uuid":"447f0e3d-dae7-4f06-885c-fe262274c46d"}
Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
Meaning (according to docs):
CloudStack could not find a host with sufficient resources (CPU, RAM, or storage) to deploy the Secondary Storage VM.
However, both hosts are green (Up) in the UI and appear to be available.
I’ve checked the following:
Hosts show “Up” status
Plenty of free CPU and RAM
Networking appears correct
Storage is connected and accessible
Question:
What could cause CloudStack to fail finding a suitable host, even though both are active?
Are there any additional requirements (e.g., network setup, storage tags, or system offering settings) I might have missed?
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions