大家认为是否应该缩小页面内容到现在的 90%？（Do people think that the page content should be reduced to 90% of its current size?）

[batmanneverdie]

原因：
我在为公司引入 Dolphinscheduler 3.1.3 版本时，大家普遍反映 DS 的页面字体过大，在笔记本特别是分辨率一般的 Windows 笔记本上，看起来很不美观，信息都挤占在一起。于是我让前端将所有页面缩放 90%（这会带来tooltip 错位，任务节点中的下拉框错位等问题，但是我们都一一解决了），结果效果很好，大家都很满意，于是我在想正在使用 Dolphinscheduler 3.x 版本的社区用户是否也有类似的感受。

大家可以直接使用浏览器的页面缩放功能缩放到 90% 体验一下（这过于简单粗暴，实际改造时还需要做一些适配），页面更美观的同时也展示了更多列表字段，且不影响阅读。

Reasons:
When I was introducing DolphinScheduler Version 3.1.3 to the company, it was widely reported by everyone that the font size on DolphinScheduler’s pages was too large. On laptops, especially Windows laptops with average resolution, the pages looked quite unattractive, and the information was crowded together. Therefore, I asked the front-end team to scale down all pages to 90%. (This adjustment would cause issues such as misaligned tooltips and misaligned drop-down boxes in task nodes, but we have resolved each of these issues one by one.) As a result, the effect was excellent and everyone was satisfied. This made me wonder whether community users who are currently using DolphinScheduler 3.x versions also have similar feelings.

Everyone can directly use the browser’s page zoom function to scale down to 90% for an experience (this is a rather simplistic and rough approach, and actual modifications still require some adaptations). After scaling, the pages are more aesthetically pleasing, display more list fields, and do not affect readability.

页面缩放 90% 的效果对比：
Page Zoom to 90%: Effect Comparison：
以下是相同操作系统（Windows 10），相同显示器（DELL P2422H 1080 分辨率）、相同浏览器（Chrome 140）上的截图（P.S. 用来对比的 DS 是 3.2.2 版本，因为之前本地部署体验过，偷懒没有部署 3.1.3 版本但是 UI 和 3.1.3 是一样的）

The following are screenshots taken on the same operating system (Windows 10), same monitor (DELL P2422H with 1080p resolution), and same browser (Chrome 140).
P.S. The DolphinScheduler (DS) version used for comparison is 3.2.2. I didn’t deploy Version 3.1.3 (took a shortcut, since I had previously deployed and tested Version 3.2.2 locally), but its UI is identical to that of Version 3.1.3.