As it stands, the current visualizations may mislead people to believe that one language is faster than another when both are within the confidence interval from each other. There are several ways we could alleviate this by including the standard deviation acquired from the benchmark within the visualizations.
One option would be to randomly vary the speed over time according to the variance, which would give languages that are basically the same speed a chance to catch up on each other and sometimes come before the other and sometimes after. (Another option could be to stretch out the balls and make them blurrier over time, but that probably wouldn't look as good.)
As it stands, the current visualizations may mislead people to believe that one language is faster than another when both are within the confidence interval from each other. There are several ways we could alleviate this by including the standard deviation acquired from the benchmark within the visualizations.
One option would be to randomly vary the speed over time according to the variance, which would give languages that are basically the same speed a chance to catch up on each other and sometimes come before the other and sometimes after. (Another option could be to stretch out the balls and make them blurrier over time, but that probably wouldn't look as good.)