Skip to content

Possible bug in coverage variation tracking #527

@evilaliv3

Description

@evilaliv3

Hello we are noticing a possible bug in the codacy variation tracking.

As reference you could check:

As you may notice we provide the coverage with two calls collecting coverage reports, one for a component written in typescript and one for a component written in pythonthat compose a single application.
When you evaluate the coverage of the current commit you evaluate it correctly. (and the coverage results ~93%)
When you compare it with the coverage of the past commit instead you are probably comparing only one part of the coverage (and the coverage results around 70%; but the same commit was evaluated 93% when it was committed sending the coverage information with two components.)

Thank you if you could check into this and let us know your findings.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions