We need to define the correct return formats for WADO-RS and WADO-URI endpoints and fix them. This is related to #59 and further discussion can be found in links there
Is the correct format this?
| WADO Path |
Return format |
| WADO-RS instance |
multipart/related |
| WADO-URI instance |
application/dicom (DICOM Part 10) |
Are we going to support/respect accept header sent from the client? which types we need to support?
I created this issue to start a discussion to define the best solution. We appreciate any input @pieper, @swederik, @hackermd, @lassoan