We need to define the correct return formats for WADO-RS and WADO-URI endpoints for frames and fix them.
Should we use similar format to #63?
| WADO Path |
Return format |
| WADO-RS frame |
multipart/related |
| WADO-URI frame |
application/dicom (DICOM Part 10) |
Are we going to support/respect accept header sent from the client? which types we need to support?
I created this issue to start a discussion to define the best solution. We appreciate any input @pieper, @swederik, @hackermd, @lassoan