misc: Openapi spec update #6756
Conversation
|
Changelist by BitoThis pull request implements the following key changes.
|
![bito-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1061978?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review Agent Run #e0ba3c
Actionable Suggestions - 4
-
specs/swagger/openapi.yaml - 4
- Login endpoint requires authentication · Line 3898-3900
- Authentication endpoints require authentication · Line 3899-3900
- Incorrect operationId for GET operation · Line 3662-3662
- Incorrect example format for string properties · Line 4446-4446
Review Details
-
Files reviewed - 1 · Commit Range:
3014efb..d11d54c- specs/swagger/openapi.yaml
-
Files skipped - 0
-
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
Bito Usage Guide
Commands
Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.
-
/review- Manually triggers a full AI review. -
/pause- Pauses automatic reviews on this pull request. -
/resume- Resumes automatic reviews. -
/resolve- Marks all Bito-posted review comments as resolved. -
/abort- Cancels all in-progress reviews.
Refer to the documentation for additional commands.
Configuration
This repository uses Default Agent You can customize the agent settings here or contact your Bito workspace admin at [email protected].
Documentation & Help
AI Code Review powered by
| security: | ||
| - bearerAuth: [] | ||
| - apiKeyAuth: [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The login endpoint /api/v1/session has security requirements (bearerAuth and apiKeyAuth) which creates a logical contradiction. A login endpoint should not require authentication to access, as it's the endpoint used to obtain authentication tokens in the first place. Remove the security section from this endpoint.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
| security: | |
| - bearerAuth: [] | |
| - apiKeyAuth: [] |
Code Review Run #e0ba3c
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
| - bearerAuth: [] | ||
| - apiKeyAuth: [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Authentication endpoints like /login should not require authentication (bearerAuth/apiKeyAuth) as they are meant to initiate the authentication flow. Users cannot authenticate to access the login endpoint. Remove security requirements from authentication endpoints.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
| - bearerAuth: [] | |
| - apiKeyAuth: [] |
Code Review Run #e0ba3c
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
| summary: used to fetch providers(recipients) | ||
| description: recipients fetch by string search, it will return slacks providers | ||
| and email ids | ||
| operationId: deleteGroupPolicy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect operationId: deleteGroupPolicy doesn't match the GET operation for fetching notification recipients. This will cause confusion in generated client code and API tooling. Change to a descriptive name like fetchNotificationRecipients.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
| operationId: deleteGroupPolicy | |
| operationId: fetchNotificationRecipients |
Code Review Run #e0ba3c
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
| properties: | ||
| apiVersion: | ||
| type: string | ||
| description: Api version from url | ||
| example: | ||
| - v1beta1 | ||
| - v1beta1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The example values for apiVersion and kind properties are incorrectly formatted as YAML arrays instead of scalar strings. Since these properties are defined as type: string, their examples should be scalar values like v1beta1 and application, not arrays like - v1beta1 and - application. This will break OpenAPI validation and code generation tools.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
- - v1beta1
+ v1beta1
@@ -4451,1 +4451,1 @@
- - application
+ application
Code Review Run #e0ba3c
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
1 participant
Description
Fixes #
Checklist:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Summary by Bito
This pull request extensively updates the OpenAPI specification by refining endpoint definitions, security configurations, and descriptive texts. The changes improve readability and consistency across various API paths, including new additions for notifications and bulk operations, while standardizing query parameters and enhancing schema definitions.