Skip to content

2011Christchurch #45

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
LanaTodorovic93 wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2011Christchurch #45

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
fc09fa2
tiny updates.
LanaTodorovic93 Mar 4, 2025
548cf24
Update induced effects.
LanaTodorovic93 Mar 4, 2025
6b0d1f0
Merge branch 'main' into 2011Christchurch
LanaTodorovic93 Mar 10, 2025
4928048
Update max shaking info.
LanaTodorovic93 Mar 10, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion Oceania/New_Zealand/20110222_M6.1_Christchurch/1_Impact/Impact_All_ID_0.csv
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,4 +2,7 @@
NZL,New_Zealand,181,181,1500,,301500,,,,,15000000000,12000000000,USD,,,EM-DAT,"Insured Damages and Total Damages, unadjusted ('000 US$)"
NZL,New_Zealand,185,185,1500,,,,,100000,Buildings,15000000000,,USD,,,NOAA,
NZL,New_Zealand,,,,,,,,,,,3500000000-8000000000,USD,,,Verisk,
NZL,New_Zealand,182,182,7171,,,,,,,,,,,,Johnston_et_al_2014,"The total injury burden was analyzed for demography, context of injury, causes of injury, and injury type. Injury context was classified as direct (shaking of the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing unavoidable injuries), action (movement of person during the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing potentially avoidable injuries), and secondary (cause of injury after shaking ceased). Nine categories of injury cause were identified (i.e. trip/fall, cleanup, projectile, helping others, children, ground damage, glass, masonry, animals)."
NZL,New_Zealand,,,,,,,,,,2.15E+10,17200000000,USD,,,SwissRe,
NZL,New_Zealand,182,182,7171,,,,,,,,,,,,Johnston_et_al_2014,"The total injury burden was analyzed for demography, context of injury, causes of injury, and injury type. Injury context was classified as direct (shaking of the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing unavoidable injuries), action (movement of person during the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing potentially avoidable injuries), and secondary (cause of injury after shaking ceased). Nine categories of injury cause were identified (i.e. trip/fall, cleanup, projectile, helping others, children, ground damage, glass, masonry, animals)."
NZL,New_Zealand,,,,70000,,,,,,,,,,,Colbert et al. (2022) + https://teara.govt.nz/en/historic-earthquakes/page-13,"In the weeks following the earthquake about 70,000 people were believed to have left the city due to uninhabitable homes, lack of basic services and continuing aftershocks"
NZL,New_Zealand,,,,,,>5000,,,,,,,liquefaction,,Cubrinovski_etaL_2011,"Nearly 20,000 was severely affected by liquefaction, with over 5,000 buildings damaged beyond repair and eventually resulted in demolition"
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion Oceania/New_Zealand/20110222_M6.1_Christchurch/1_Impact/Impact_Human_ID_1.csv
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,4 +5,6 @@
3,Canterbury Region,8,8,,,,,,,,,Died on buses in the central city,New_Zealand_Police,,,,,
3,Canterbury Region,28,28,,,,,,,,,Died in other areas of the central city,New_Zealand_Police,,,,,
3,Canterbury Region,12,12,,,,,,,,,Died in suburban locations,New_Zealand_Police,,,,,
3,Canterbury Region,182,182,7171,,,,,,,,,Johnston_et_al_2014,"The total injury burden was analyzed for demography, context of injury, causes of injury, and injury type. Injury context was classified as direct (shaking of the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing unavoidable injuries), action (movement of person during the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing potentially avoidable injuries), and secondary (cause of injury after shaking ceased). Nine categories of injury cause were identified (i.e. trip/fall, cleanup, projectile, helping others, children, ground damage, glass, masonry, animals).",,,,
3,Canterbury Region,182,182,7171,,,,,,,,,Johnston_et_al_2014,"The total injury burden was analyzed for demography, context of injury, causes of injury, and injury type. Injury context was classified as direct (shaking of the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing unavoidable injuries), action (movement of person during the primary earthquake or aftershocks causing potentially avoidable injuries), and secondary (cause of injury after shaking ceased). Nine categories of injury cause were identified (i.e. trip/fall, cleanup, projectile, helping others, children, ground damage, glass, masonry, animals).",,,,
3,Canterbury Region,,,,,,,,,70000,,,Colbert et al. (2022) + https://teara.govt.nz/en/historic-earthquakes/page-13,"In the weeks following the earthquake about 70,000 people were believed to have left the city due to uninhabitable homes, lack of basic services and continuing aftershocks",,,,
3,Canterbury Region,181,181,>7000,,,,>10000,,,,,EEFIT mission,"Official figures reveal that there were 181 confirmed fatalities, over 7,000 injuries and over 10,000 people were made homeless",,,,
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion Oceania/New_Zealand/20110222_M6.1_Christchurch/1_Impact/Impact_Human_ID_2.csv
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
ID_1,NAME_1,ID_2,NAME_2,FATALITIES,FATALITIES_GROUND_SHAKING,INJURIES,INJURIES_LIGHT,INJURIES_SEVERE,INJURIES_CRITICAL,HOMELESS,SHELTERED,DISPLACED_POPULATION,AFFECTED_POPULATION,CAUSE_OF_INJURY/DEATH,REFERENCE,COMMENTS,FATALITIES_FROM_FACADES_OR_WALLS_COLLAPSE,FATALITIES_INSIDE_BUILDINGS,FATALITIES_FOR_CHIMNEY_BREAST_COLLAPSE,OTHER
3,Canterbury Region,13,Christchurch,42,42,,,,,,,,,,Caterbury_Earthquake_Royal_Commission_2012 + Cambridge Earthquake Impact Database,Individual unreinforced masonry buildings that caused fatalities: forty-two people died as a result of building failures (other than the Canterbury Television and Pyne Gould Corporation buildings) in the 22 February 2011 earthquake. Walls constructed of solid clay bricks in cement mortar. Roof and floor framing in timber. Most are 1- and 2-storey buildings.,35,4,1,2
3,Canterbury Region,13,Christchurch,182,182,6659,,,,,,,,,University of Otago + Cambridge Earthquake Impact Database,,,,,
3,Canterbury Region,13,Christchurch,182,182,6659,,,,,,,,,University of Otago + Cambridge Earthquake Impact Database,,,,,
3,Canterbury Region,13,Christchurch,,,,,,,,,70000,,,Colbert et al. (2022) + https://teara.govt.nz/en/historic-earthquakes/page-13,"In the weeks following the earthquake about 70,000 people were believed to have left the city due to uninhabitable homes, lack of basic services and continuing aftershocks",,,,
3,Canterbury Region,13,Christchurch,181,181,>7000,,,,>10000,,,,,EEFIT mission,"Official figures reveal that there were 181 confirmed fatalities, over 7,000 injuries and over 10,000 people were made homeless",,,,
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions Oceania/New_Zealand/20110222_M6.1_Christchurch/1_Impact/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,16 +30,22 @@ Check the definitions of the parameters used in the impact files in the [impact

### Publications

- **Kam_et_al_2010:** Kam WY, Pampanin S, Dhakal R, Gavin HP, Roeder C (2010). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43(4):340-350. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.4.340-350.

- **Cubrinovski_et_al_2011:** Cubrinovski M, Bradley B, Wotherspoon L et al. (2011). Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.
Bulletin of New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4):205-226. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.205-226

- **Ingham_and_Griffith_2011:** Ingham JM, Griffith MC (2011). The performance of earthquake strengthened URM buildings in the Christchurch CBD in the 22 February 2011 earthquake. Addendum Report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry.

- **Johnston_et_al_2014:** Johnston D, Standring S, Ronan K, Lindell M, Wilson T, Cousins J, Aldridge E, Ardagh MW, Deely JM, Jensen S, Kirsch T, Bissell R (2014). The 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes: context and cause of injury. Natural Hazards, 73:627-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1094-7.

- **Kam_et_al_2010:** Kam WY, Pampanin S, Dhakal R, Gavin HP, Roeder C (2010). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43(4):340-350. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.4.340-350.

- **Lin_et_al_2014:** Lin SL, Uma S, Nayyerloo M, Buxton R, King A (2014). Engineering characterisation of building performance with detailed engineering evaluation (DEE) data from the Canterbury earthquake sequence. ASEC 2014 Conference, Structural Engineering in Australasia–World Standards (Auckland, New Zealand). Data available online at: http://www.ceqid.org/CEQID/Earthquake.aspx?p=32&ix=75&pid=32&prcid=17&ppid=600.

- **Moon_et_al_2014:** Moon L, Dizhur D, Senaldi I, Derakhshan H, Griffith M, Magenes G, Ingham J (2014). The demise of the URM building stock in Christchurch during the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra, 30(1):253-276. https://doi.org/10.1193/022113EQS044M.

- **Colbert_et_al_2022:** Colbert J, Sila-Nowicka K, Yao J (2022). Driving forces of population change following the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New
Zealand: A multiscale geographically weighted regression approach. Population, Space and Place, 28(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2583


### Global databases / references

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Oceania/New_Zealand/20110222_M6.1_Christchurch/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The `2011 Christchurch earthquake`, which struck on Tuesday, 22 February at 12:5

## Estimated and observed ground shaking

The folder [OpenQuake_gmfs](./OpenQuake_gmfs/) contains the input files required to generate ground motion fields, considering different rupture solutions and conditioning the ground shaking to the recording stations for the event, where available. The figures below present an example of the results, illustrating the median ground motion fields with and without conditioning. These results are based on the rupture and ground motion model that demonstrates the lowest nominal bias. The maximum recorded Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) was [insert value here], observed at [insert location here]. If no seismic station data were available for the event, the generated ground motion fields are shown w
The folder [OpenQuake_gmfs](./OpenQuake_gmfs/) contains the input files required to generate ground motion fields, considering different rupture solutions and conditioning the ground shaking to the recording stations for the event, where available. The figures below present an example of the results, illustrating the median ground motion fields with and without conditioning. These results are based on the rupture and ground motion model that demonstrates the lowest nominal bias. The maximum recorded Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) was 1.63 g, observed at Heathcote Valley Primary School site (station code: HVSC). If no seismic station data were available for the event, the generated ground motion fields are shown w

<img src="./4_OpenQuake_gmfs/median_gmf_stations_none.png" height="250">
<img src="./4_OpenQuake_gmfs/median_gmf_stations_seismic.png" height="250">
Expand Down