GitHub Docs

[asrar-mared]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

اقتراح تحسين لقسم International Experience

أقترح إعادة صياغة الفقرة لتشمل:

• أمثلة من مشاريع عالمية مفتوحة المصدر
• توضيح كيف يُمكن للمستخدمين من دول مختلفة المساهمة بفعالية
• إضافة روابط لأدلة الترجمة أو التوطين

هذا التحديث سيُعزز من فهم المستخدمين الدوليين ويُشجع على المشاركة العالمية.

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

Hello GitHub Docs Team,
I would like to suggest an improvement on the International Experience section to better reflect the global diversity of contributors and users.
Content can be enhanced by adding real-life examples from international projects, and demonstrating how GitHub enables cross-border collaboration.
I also suggest including links to translation and localization guides, making it easier for non-English speaking users to understand the content and participate effectively.

This update will enhance the comprehensiveness of the documentation and highlight the global dimension of the GitHub platform.

Thank you for your continued efforts,
Sincerely,

Additional information

No response

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this issue. A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

[docs-bot]

This issue may have been opened accidentally. I'm going to close it now, but feel free to open a new issue with a more descriptive title!

[asrar-mared]

This is not just a suggestion for improvement, but a call to reframe the experience.

"International Experience" section deserves to be told in a language that reflects the true diversity of the global GitHub community.
I propose restructuring the content to include real-life examples from international contributors, highlighting translation and localization tools, and providing clear guidance for users from multiple linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
documentation is not just words, it is a bridge between minds. Let us build it well.

[asrar-mared]

This issue was opened after a careful review of the existing content, and a gap was found to be affecting the user experience or accuracy of documentation.

the goal of this contribution is not just to report, but to stimulate real improvement that reflects the philosophy of quality and professionalism.
we don't just report problems, we reframe concepts to be clearer, more comprehensive, and more in line with the identity of the project.
this step comes as part of the "digital warrior" approach to fortifying knowledge, and signing every line with a standard that does not breach.

[Sharra-writes]

@asrar-mared Sorry, the bot closes certain issues automatically based on criteria we've set that are common markers of spam bots. I've reopened it.

Do you have specific examples you would like to cite and ideas for restructuring the content? The Docs team doesn't have significant resources to devote to a project like this, but I might be able to provide support for an open source project.