Skip to content

Conversation

@hanouticelina
Copy link
Contributor

it's safe to ignore imo, since we check is_simple_optional_type(expected_type) is True, which means expected_type is Optional[X]. The unwrap function returns X, which is the inner type of ARGS_T.

also, a stable version of ty might be coming soon maybe? 👀 https://x.com/charliermarsh/status/1995153742040330467?s=20

@hanouticelina hanouticelina requested a review from Wauplin December 1, 2025 13:22
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

Copy link
Contributor

@Wauplin Wauplin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Agree ignoring is good here

also, a stable version of ty might be coming soon maybe? 👀 https://x.com/charliermarsh/status/1995153742040330467?s=20

👀

@hanouticelina hanouticelina merged commit b2215d1 into main Dec 1, 2025
19 of 23 checks passed
@hanouticelina hanouticelina deleted the fix-quality branch December 1, 2025 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants