docid.type may be wrong

[strogonoff]

In this case, W3C documents’ docid.type is IETF, but it probably this should be W3C. Even though docid.type does not reflect publisher but schema/namespace, it still seems inappropriate to use IETF.

https://github.com/ietf-ribose/relaton-data-misc/blob/2540405759186e98c902248a58c15e9c49b64b37/data/reference.W3C.CR-rdf-schema.yaml#L14-L19

[ronaldtse]

These are W3C bibliographic data as provided by IETF. These document identifiers are indeed assigned by IETF, not by W3C. Maybe this should be considered correct?

[strogonoff]

Whether acceptable or not depends on semantics of docid.type, which are still unclear to me.

[strogonoff]

According to Ronald’s comment on #5,

The publisher is not IETF.