|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: expert beginner vs Generalizing Specialists vs icicle-shaped vs t-shaped |
| 3 | +date: 2024-10-09T09:10:00+08:00 |
| 4 | +categories: |
| 5 | +- carear |
| 6 | +tags: |
| 7 | +- t-shaped |
| 8 | +- expert beginner |
| 9 | +- Generalizing Specialists |
| 10 | +- icicle-shaped |
| 11 | +--- |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +Today I read an article https://kevin.the.li/posts/learning-to-learn/[Learning to learn] and it mentions the concept https://daedtech.com/how-developers-stop-learning-rise-of-the-expert-beginner/["expert beginner"] I learnt in past. I am wondering the differences among other concepts (namely generalizing Specialists, icicle-shaped vs t-shaped) in those domain, where I fall into the category, do I do the correct career choices etc. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +The differences among them can be quickly generated from chatgpt, I quoted the answers here for quick references. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +[cols="1,1,1,1,1", options="header"] |
| 18 | +|=== |
| 19 | +| Aspect | Expert Beginner | T-Shaped Professional | Generalizing Specialist | Icicle-Shaped Specialist |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +| Skill Depth | Shallow to moderate | Deep in one area | Deep in multiple areas | Very deep in a few narrow fields |
| 22 | +| Skill Breadth | Narrow | Broad across disciplines | Moderate to broad | Narrow |
| 23 | +| Adaptability | Low | High | Very high | Low to moderate |
| 24 | +| Collaboration | Limited | High | Very high | Moderate |
| 25 | +| Learning Attitude | Resistant | Open to learning | Continuously learning | Focused on specific expertise |
| 26 | +| Best Fit Roles | Operational or repetitive tasks | Agile teams, product teams | Cross-disciplinary leadership | Niche technical roles |
| 27 | +| Risk | Stagnation | Losing depth over time | Burnout or skill overload | Over-specialization |
| 28 | +|=== |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Thinking those concepts as a spectrum, I think I fall into between Generalizing Specialist and Icicle-Shaped. In some domains, I have moderate level knowledge by choice, and I can dive deep fastly as needed by projects or products using the skills and strategies (e.g. mindmap, 20/80 principles, spaced repetition, overexposure, diagrams[uml, bpmn], positive transfer of knowledge) I mastered during my continuous learning journey. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +When and how I got there? I was aware of ageism and how to do countermeasure to make age be assets instead of liabilites when I was about 35 years old. Since then, I kept to learn new things in IT technologies, startups, finance, accounting, general business info and other business domains. Since the broad domains and information, I sought unconventional ways such as spaced repetition, second brain, personal knowledge management to keep things in memory in a substained way. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +I doubted my action in past. Only recent years, I found some articles elaborated on those career choices under other concepts below. The experiences shared by others resonate deeply with my own. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +. https://www.noidea.dog/glue[be glue] |
| 37 | +. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-build-strong-career-tech-thiago-ghisi/[How to Build a Strong Career in Tech] |
| 38 | +. career moat etc |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +I think those things should be in some contexts as well such as high profile big IT tech companies or others, timing before LLM/GPT etc. Should I change my strategies accordingly? I am still exploring it now. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Another trend shows in https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/18h1b0t/the_tech_industry_currently_favors_specialized/[The tech industry currently favors specialized engineers over generalists], I don't have number and not sure if it is true now, I might follow up it for a while to get sense of it. |
0 commit comments