Skip to content

Conversation

@padovan
Copy link
Contributor

@padovan padovan commented Sep 5, 2025

No description provided.

@padovan padovan requested a review from patersonc September 5, 2025 13:12
@padovan padovan self-assigned this Sep 5, 2025
@aliceinwire
Copy link
Member

aliceinwire commented Sep 5, 2025

Please add also GkernelCI https://github.com/gkernelci
GkernelCI was the first KernelCI outsider framework to connect to KernelCI using kcidb
GkernelCI is still supporting and collaborating with KernelCI

image

@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 5, 2025

Please add also GkernelCI https://github.com/gkernelci GkernelCI was the first KernelCI outsider framework to connect to KernelCI using kcidb GkernelCI is still supporting and collaborating with KernelCI

but is it active as of today? I don't see any data from GKernelCI

@aliceinwire
Copy link
Member

aliceinwire commented Sep 5, 2025

Please add also GkernelCI https://github.com/gkernelci GkernelCI was the first KernelCI outsider framework to connect to KernelCI using kcidb GkernelCI is still supporting and collaborating with KernelCI

but is it active as of today? I don't see any data from GKernelCI

Is active, the data is currently getting restored.
kcidb deprecated the old scheme breaking GKernelCI kcidb data sender, also the authentication system caused problem .
We sent a mail for having a new key, but we didn't get one yet (there was a discussion about waiting for kcidb-ng to be able to accept data).
Also because enough time passed since the request,
we are trying in different ways to add data to KernelCI,
That's the recent request on discord of having a GKernelCI (gentoo-sources) tree in KernelCI.

@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 5, 2025

Please add also GkernelCI https://github.com/gkernelci GkernelCI was the first KernelCI outsider framework to connect to KernelCI using kcidb GkernelCI is still supporting and collaborating with KernelCI

but is it active as of today? I don't see any data from GKernelCI

Is active, the data is currently getting restored. kcidb deprecated the old scheme breaking GKernelCI kcidb data sender, also the authentication system caused problem . We sent a mail for having a new key, but we didn't get one yet (there was a discussion about waiting for kcidb-ng to be able to accept data). Also because enough time passed since the request, we are trying in different ways to add data to KernelCI, That's the recent request on discord of having a GKernelCI (gentoo-sources) tree in KernelCI.

Okay. But we should add the Gentoo logo. The goal of this having this in our home page is to show which orgs take part in KernelCI. So I'd have the gentoo logo, not it's specific CI logo. It would make it hard for the casual visitor to understand how big our ecosystem is and who is part of it.

@padovan padovan force-pushed the ci-ecosystem-and-hw-labs branch from 7926ef2 to a8293f2 Compare September 5, 2025 17:01
@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 5, 2025

Gentoo logo added.

@padovan padovan force-pushed the ci-ecosystem-and-hw-labs branch from a8293f2 to 999d438 Compare September 6, 2025 11:30
@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 12, 2025

I removed the gentoo logo after a chat with @aliceinwire. This is ready to be merged.

@patersonc patersonc merged commit 455176d into kernelci:main Sep 17, 2025
1 check passed
@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 17, 2025

These are up in our home page now: https://kernelci.org/

Can we merge this PR?

@patersonc
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @padovan

These are up in our home page now: https://kernelci.org/

Can we merge this PR?

I did :)

Although looking at it now - we don't actually show the logos on the CI Ecosystem & HW Labs page. Was that the intention?

@padovan
Copy link
Contributor Author

padovan commented Sep 17, 2025

Yes. It is just a storage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants