Skip to content

Conversation

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator

@t-bast t-bast commented Nov 19, 2025

Since the introduction of option_anchors, pre-signed HTLC transactions don't include any fees, and thus don't contribute to trimming. This results in HTLC outputs in the commitment transactions that may be forever uneconomical to spend, and will pollute the utxo set.

We should use a dust_limit_satoshis that is higher than Bitcoin Core's standard values to take into account the cost of these second-stage txs at a reasonable (TM) feerate. If we want for example to be able to claim HTLC outputs at 20 sat/byte, we need a dust_limit_satoshis of around 4 000 sats.

Since the introduction of `option_anchors`, pre-signed HTLC transactions
don't include any fees, and thus don't contribute to trimming. This
results in HTLC outputs in the commitment transactions that may be
forever uneconomical to spend, and will pollute the utxo set.

We should use a `dust_limit_satoshis` that is higher than Bitcoin Core's
standard values to take into account the cost of these second-stage txs
at a reasonable (TM) feerate.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant