Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think this uses a background thread to offload the plugin's processing to a second CPU core at the expense of a full buffer worth of latency. Something like this can potentially be a useful tool, but I think it is better implemented at the host level, like MOD's "portal": |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have heard from users of MOD devices that their NAM plugin has a buffered mode that reduces CPU a lot but of course adds latency. Is this something that can be added to your plugin and if so would like 48 samples (1ms) reduce the CPU a lot?
User abotte over at MOD forum reports that if he uses buffered mode the CPU usage of a NANO model goes from 78% to 18%.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions