Replies: 3 comments
-
| 
         Sounds like a plan!  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| 
         After the transference to the  
  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| 
         Closing this discussion as we decided to move in a different direction, see #188  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At an open meeting in the public ngworkers Discord server on 2023-08-05, the team drafted the following release plan for transitioning from the Angular-specific
@ngworker/lumberjackpackage to@lumberjackjs-scoped npm packages.New packages pull request (feature: extract lumberjack core into an agnostic library #154)
a. Implement new packages
b. Write guide to migrating from
@ngworker/lumberjackc. Merge pull request
Transfer Lumberjack repo from the ngworker GitHub organization to the lumberjack-js GitHub organization
Update tooling
a. Discord bots
b. SonarCloud
c. Docusaurus
Consider RFCs
Release new packages
a. Update metadata
b. Publish to npm
c. Tag GitHub releases
Deprecate the
@ngworker/lumberjackpackage on npm, referring to the new Angular-specific package,@lumberjackjs/angular.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions