feat: Split AFJ demo for two cases: Main and DidCommV2

[Artemkaaas]

Started work on splitting the Alice/Faber demo into smaller cases. Using this we can add demos for various optional modules.

• Main - general demo of issuing credentials and presenting the proof
• DidComm V2 - demo reflecting supported didcomm v2 protocols

[TimoGlastra]

I think overall LGTM. I'm not sure though on splitting it up. What if we add an option to create a v1 or v2 invitation? And on the other side we just do receive invitation and it will accept both?

I think an agent should be able to run both at the same time, so I don't see a specific reason to split it up

[Artemkaaas]

I think overall LGTM. I'm not sure though on splitting it up. What if we add an option to create a v1 or v2 invitation? And on the other side we just do receive invitation and it will accept both?

I think an agent should be able to run both at the same time, so I don't see a specific reason to split it up

What if we add an option to create a v1 or v2 invitation? And on the other side we just do receive invitation and it will accept both?

This is how it's currently done in hyperledger:feat/didcomm-v2.
I thought of splitting the main demo into independent cases so that we can create demos for conflicting cases such as: indy/askar wallets, indy/cheqd ledgers, cl/w3c credentials etc...

[TimoGlastra]

Discussed on AFJ WG call. It's okay to split up the demo.