Skip to content

Consider supporting SARIF for Flake8 #6178

@reactive-firewall

Description

@reactive-firewall

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
SARIF can be used for both security and for code quality, and Mega-linter already uses flake8, WHY not support SARIF?

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Use something like: https://github.com/reactive-firewall/flake8-cq (see my [bin/Flake8LintCLI.py](https://github.com/reactive-firewall/flake8-cq/blob/master/bin/Flake8LintCLI.py) tool)

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

🤷 competing with mega-lint, (_ If you can't beat them, join them _)

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

  • https://github.com/reactive-firewall/flake8-cq only targets github actions
  • [bin/Flake8LintCLI.py](https://github.com/reactive-firewall/flake8-cq/blob/master/bin/Flake8LintCLI.py) tool could probably be adapted to many other SARIF use-cases.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions