Unrolled build for rust-lang#135900

Rollup merge of rust-lang#135900 - compiler-errors:derive-wf, r=lcnr

Manually walk into WF obligations in `BestObligation` proof tree visitor

When we encounter a `WellFormed` obligation in the `BestObligation` proof tree visitor, ignore the proof tree and call `wf::unnormalized_obligations` to derive well-formed obligations with the correct cause codes. This is to avoid having to replicate the somewhat delicate logic that `wf.rs` does to set up its obligation causes... Don't see a better way to do this.

vibes?? r? lcnr

Author: rust-timer

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/delegate.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 use std::ops::Deref;
 
 use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
-use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
+use rustc_hir::def_id::{CRATE_DEF_ID, DefId};
 use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::query_response::make_query_region_constraints;
 use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::{
     Canonical, CanonicalExt as _, CanonicalQueryInput, CanonicalVarInfo, CanonicalVarValues,
@@ -98,9 +98,10 @@ impl<'tcx> rustc_next_trait_solver::delegate::SolverDelegate for SolverDelegate<
         param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
         arg: ty::GenericArg<'tcx>,
     ) -> Option<Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>> {
-        crate::traits::wf::unnormalized_obligations(&self.0, param_env, arg).map(|obligations| {
-            obligations.into_iter().map(|obligation| obligation.into()).collect()
-        })
+        crate::traits::wf::unnormalized_obligations(&self.0, param_env, arg, DUMMY_SP, CRATE_DEF_ID)
+            .map(|obligations| {
+                obligations.into_iter().map(|obligation| obligation.into()).collect()
+            })
     }
 
     fn clone_opaque_types_for_query_response(&self) -> Vec<(ty::OpaqueTypeKey<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)> {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill.rs

@@ -194,47 +194,57 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
 
         let goals = instantiated_goals
             .into_iter()
-            .map(|(source, goal)| match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
-                Some(ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term })) => {
-                    let unconstrained_term = match term.unpack() {
-                        ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => infcx.next_ty_var(span).into(),
-                        ty::TermKind::Const(_) => infcx.next_const_var(span).into(),
-                    };
-                    let goal =
-                        goal.with(infcx.tcx, ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term: unconstrained_term });
-                    // We have to use a `probe` here as evaluating a `NormalizesTo` can constrain the
-                    // expected term. This means that candidates which only fail due to nested goals
-                    // and which normalize to a different term then the final result could ICE: when
-                    // building their proof tree, the expected term was unconstrained, but when
-                    // instantiating the candidate it is already constrained to the result of another
-                    // candidate.
-                    let proof_tree = infcx
-                        .probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal_raw(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1);
-                    InspectGoal::new(
-                        infcx,
-                        self.goal.depth + 1,
-                        proof_tree.unwrap(),
-                        Some(NormalizesToTermHack { term, unconstrained_term }),
-                        source,
-                    )
-                }
-                _ => {
-                    // We're using a probe here as evaluating a goal could constrain
-                    // inference variables by choosing one candidate. If we then recurse
-                    // into another candidate who ends up with different inference
-                    // constraints, we get an ICE if we already applied the constraints
-                    // from the chosen candidate.
-                    let proof_tree = infcx
-                        .probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1)
-                        .unwrap();
-                    InspectGoal::new(infcx, self.goal.depth + 1, proof_tree, None, source)
-                }
-            })
+            .map(|(source, goal)| self.instantiate_proof_tree_for_nested_goal(source, goal, span))
             .collect();
 
         (goals, opt_impl_args)
     }
 
+    pub fn instantiate_proof_tree_for_nested_goal(
+        &self,
+        source: GoalSource,
+        goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
+        span: Span,
+    ) -> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
+        let infcx = self.goal.infcx;
+        match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
+            Some(ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term })) => {
+                let unconstrained_term = match term.unpack() {
+                    ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => infcx.next_ty_var(span).into(),
+                    ty::TermKind::Const(_) => infcx.next_const_var(span).into(),
+                };
+                let goal =
+                    goal.with(infcx.tcx, ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term: unconstrained_term });
+                // We have to use a `probe` here as evaluating a `NormalizesTo` can constrain the
+                // expected term. This means that candidates which only fail due to nested goals
+                // and which normalize to a different term then the final result could ICE: when
+                // building their proof tree, the expected term was unconstrained, but when
+                // instantiating the candidate it is already constrained to the result of another
+                // candidate.
+                let proof_tree =
+                    infcx.probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal_raw(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1);
+                InspectGoal::new(
+                    infcx,
+                    self.goal.depth + 1,
+                    proof_tree.unwrap(),
+                    Some(NormalizesToTermHack { term, unconstrained_term }),
+                    source,
+                )
+            }
+            _ => {
+                // We're using a probe here as evaluating a goal could constrain
+                // inference variables by choosing one candidate. If we then recurse
+                // into another candidate who ends up with different inference
+                // constraints, we get an ICE if we already applied the constraints
+                // from the chosen candidate.
+                let proof_tree = infcx
+                    .probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1)
+                    .unwrap();
+                InspectGoal::new(infcx, self.goal.depth + 1, proof_tree, None, source)
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
     /// Visit all nested goals of this candidate, rolling back
     /// all inference constraints.
     pub fn visit_nested_in_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill/derive_errors.rs

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ use crate::infer::{InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
 use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt;
 use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _;
 
+#[derive(Debug)]
 pub struct FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
     pub obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
     pub code: FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx>,
@@ -107,12 +108,6 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
     }
 }
 
-impl<'tcx> Debug for FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
-    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
-        write!(f, "FulfillmentError({:?},{:?})", self.obligation, self.code)
-    }
-}
-
 #[derive(Clone)]
 pub enum FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx> {
     /// Inherently impossible to fulfill; this trait is implemented if and only

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ use rustc_infer::traits::query::type_op::ImpliedOutlivesBounds;
 use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::CanonicalQueryResponse;
 use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, ParamEnvAnd, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFolder, TypeVisitableExt};
-use rustc_span::Span;
 use rustc_span::def_id::CRATE_DEF_ID;
+use rustc_span::{DUMMY_SP, Span};
 use rustc_type_ir::outlives::{Component, push_outlives_components};
 use smallvec::{SmallVec, smallvec};
 use tracing::debug;
@@ -92,7 +92,9 @@ pub fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds_inner<'tcx>(
 
         // From the full set of obligations, just filter down to the region relationships.
         for obligation in
-            wf::unnormalized_obligations(ocx.infcx, param_env, arg).into_iter().flatten()
+            wf::unnormalized_obligations(ocx.infcx, param_env, arg, DUMMY_SP, CRATE_DEF_ID)
+                .into_iter()
+                .flatten()
         {
             assert!(!obligation.has_escaping_bound_vars());
             let Some(pred) = obligation.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() else {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/mod.rs

@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{
     self, GenericArg, GenericArgKind, GenericArgsRef, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeSuperVisitable,
     TypeVisitable, TypeVisitableExt, TypeVisitor,
 };
-use rustc_span::def_id::{CRATE_DEF_ID, DefId, LocalDefId};
-use rustc_span::{DUMMY_SP, Span};
+use rustc_span::Span;
+use rustc_span::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
 use tracing::{debug, instrument, trace};
 
 use crate::infer::InferCtxt;
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ pub fn unnormalized_obligations<'tcx>(
     infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
     param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     arg: GenericArg<'tcx>,
+    span: Span,
+    body_id: LocalDefId,
 ) -> Option<PredicateObligations<'tcx>> {
     debug_assert_eq!(arg, infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(arg));
 
@@ -106,8 +108,8 @@ pub fn unnormalized_obligations<'tcx>(
     let mut wf = WfPredicates {
         infcx,
         param_env,
-        body_id: CRATE_DEF_ID,
-        span: DUMMY_SP,
+        body_id,
+        span,
         out: PredicateObligations::new(),
         recursion_depth: 0,
         item: None,

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/query/type_op/implied_outlives_bounds.rs

@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ LL | fn main() -> Foo::Bar::<Vec<[u32]>> {}
    |                         ^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
    |
    = help: the trait `Sized` is not implemented for `[u32]`
+note: required by an implicit `Sized` bound in `Vec`
+  --> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/wf.rs

@@ -6,35 +6,29 @@ LL | #![feature(const_trait_impl, generic_const_exprs)]
    |
    = help: remove one of these features
 
-error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot normalize `<&T as ConstName>::{constant#0}`
-  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:19:49
+error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `the constant `name_len::<T>()` can be evaluated`
+  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:21:5
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + ConstName> const ConstName for &T
-   |                                                 ^^ cannot normalize `<&T as ConstName>::{constant#0}`
+LL |     [(); name_len::<T>()]:,
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot satisfy `the constant `name_len::<T>()` can be evaluated`
    |
-note: required for `&T` to implement `~const ConstName`
-  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:19:35
+note: required by a bound in `<&T as ConstName>`
+  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:21:10
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + ConstName> const ConstName for &T
-   |                                   ^^^^^^^^^     ^^
-LL | where
 LL |     [(); name_len::<T>()]:,
-   |     --------------------- unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `<&T as ConstName>`
 
-error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot normalize `<&mut T as ConstName>::{constant#0}`
-  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:26:49
+error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `the constant `name_len::<T>()` can be evaluated`
+  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:28:5
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + ConstName> const ConstName for &mut T
-   |                                                 ^^^^^^ cannot normalize `<&mut T as ConstName>::{constant#0}`
+LL |     [(); name_len::<T>()]:,
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot satisfy `the constant `name_len::<T>()` can be evaluated`
    |
-note: required for `&mut T` to implement `~const ConstName`
-  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:26:35
+note: required by a bound in `<&mut T as ConstName>`
+  --> $DIR/issue-88119.rs:28:10
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + ConstName> const ConstName for &mut T
-   |                                   ^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^^^
-LL | where
 LL |     [(); name_len::<T>()]:,
-   |     --------------------- unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `<&mut T as ConstName>`
 
 error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
 

tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/bugs/wf-check-skipped.next.stderr

@@ -16,23 +16,13 @@ LL |     where
 LL |         T: AsExpression<Self::SqlType>,
    |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Foo::check`
 
-error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied
-  --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15
-   |
-LL |     SelectInt.check("bar");
-   |               ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str`
-   |
-   = help: the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str`
-           but trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for it
-   = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer`
-
 error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<SelectInt as Expression>::SqlType == Text`
   --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:5
    |
 LL |     SelectInt.check("bar");
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Text`, found `Integer`
 
-error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 
 Some errors have detailed explanations: E0271, E0277.
 For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0271`.