Replies: 2 comments
-
|
could you share what you did if you got it solved in the end? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
me too |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Metamask sig utils SignTypedDataVersion.V4, (tested with SignTypedDataVersion.V3 same)
Metamask sig utils generated signature 0x93f39c57d7f8de7b033367cb5fa7bb68c6a339b0626c73febc57fdce5a779a8472b365951470ade9857e8bd26a3020e9088c110c931abd188034cbdd1e79f8191c
wagmi signTypedData
wagmi signTypedData 0x9655d8635d4826a1c44185acb34f7c86b286e90e70bd260626c8dd112ae8f5f348f75ce387544c1734971f6ae51ad855e98a49c7e56c3a636a90f714378aca0d1c
My question is why both produce different result of signatures? I was confusing on why these both producing different signature, does it possible both lib produce same signature?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions