Skip to content

Conversation

@t-bast
Copy link
Member

@t-bast t-bast commented Oct 8, 2024

We initially supported splicing with a poor man's quiescence, where we allowed splice messages if the commitments were already quiescent.

We've shipped support for quiescence since then, which means that new even nodes relying on experimental splicing should support quiescence. We can thus remove support for the non-quiescent version.

This has been extracted from #2887.

We initially supported splicing with a poor man's quiescence, where we
allowed splice messages if the commitments were already quiescent.

We've shipped support for quiescence since then, which means that new
even nodes relying on experimental splicing should support quiescence.
We can thus remove support for the non-quiescent version.
@t-bast t-bast requested a review from remyers October 8, 2024 09:17
Copy link
Contributor

@remyers remyers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a straightforward refactor. LGTM!

@t-bast t-bast merged commit 1b749e1 into master Oct 8, 2024
1 check passed
@t-bast t-bast deleted the remove-splice-without-quiescence branch October 8, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants