Skip to content

Conversation

@cmhamel
Copy link
Contributor

@cmhamel cmhamel commented Mar 30, 2025

@lxmota I put together what the AMDGPU.jl package extension should look like. It's a mirror of the current CUDA extension I have in place.

I can't really test this right now so whenever you get a chance, let me know if it works. I'm planning on getting an AMD chip in the near future.

Just FYI, if you're not too familiar with package extensions... you can load this in the REPL as follows

using FiniteElementContainers, Adapt, AMDGPU

and that will load in the Adapt and the AMDGPU package extensions.

You can mimic the TestPoissonCUDA.jl example for testing purposes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 34.17%. Comparing base (3bd6e86) to head (635fb31).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ext/FiniteElementContainersAMDGPUExt.jl 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #86      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   34.26%   34.17%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          38       39       +1     
  Lines        2136     2142       +6     
==========================================
  Hits          732      732              
- Misses       1404     1410       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lxmota
Copy link

lxmota commented Mar 30, 2025 via email

@cmhamel cmhamel merged commit 635fb31 into main Mar 30, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants