Show package name in derivation inventories

[cole-h]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated build configuration to include package names in derivation metadata.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c464b0 and 77b1d70.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• flake.nix

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single line in flake.nix is modified within the lib.derivationsInventory section to compute the what field as a string that includes both the existing what value and the package name, rather than inheriting the existing value directly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Nix Configuration flake.nix	Modified the what field computation in derivation entries to include package name via string interpolation: "${what} '${package.name}'" instead of inheriting the existing value.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through derivations bright,
Adding names to each in sight,
What was once plain, now shows its face,
Package identity finds its place! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: showing package names in derivation inventories by modifying how the 'what' field is computed in flake.nix.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch cole-h/push-spxzppkzmmzs

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cole-h]

(Discussed briefly: we probably want to make nix flake show show this, but through the C++ rather than through changing the what so that it can stay as "just" what exactly it is: it's e.g. a package)