Skip to content

Conversation

pfeerick
Copy link
Member

@pfeerick pfeerick commented May 5, 2025

Or really it's a test to see if the fork preview-web fix is working... this might be a false positive as I do have write permissions on the repo anyway, but IIRC it did fail for me before... 🤔

@pfeerick pfeerick marked this pull request as draft May 5, 2025 11:33
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.46%. Comparing base (18b5642) to head (0039997).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #103   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.46%   41.46%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       12059    12059           
  Branches      525      525           
=======================================
  Hits         5000     5000           
  Misses       7050     7050           
  Partials        9        9           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pfeerick pfeerick force-pushed the pfeerick/fork-pr-test branch 4 times, most recently from 260cee9 to c88cf14 Compare May 6, 2025 07:49
@pfeerick pfeerick marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2025 10:52
@pfeerick pfeerick force-pushed the pfeerick/fork-pr-test branch from c88cf14 to 0039997 Compare May 6, 2025 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant