Skip to content

Conversation

@araujoms
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #1149

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (1137b4c) to head (bb5f566).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1150      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.81%   91.85%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines       15342    15342              
==========================================
+ Hits        14087    14092       +5     
+ Misses       1255     1250       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jd-foster
Copy link
Collaborator

Would it be possible to add a test for this as well?

@araujoms
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure.


@testset "svd (#11120/#11247)" begin
@testset "svd (#11120/#11247/#1149)" begin
D[1] = 0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this changing D for all the tests coming after this? I see that tests pass, but perhaps it's better to introduce a small new testset with the example you gave in the original issue:

d = [1, 2, 3, 4, 0]
@test svd(diagm(d)) == svd(Diagonal(d))

?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it is. That was intentional, as the subsequent test was also failing for singular matrices. I thought about doing that when D is generated in the first place, as a zero is more useful test than a random number, but decided against because that would be confusing.

I don't have anything to do with issue, though, I just randomly found it and decided to fix it because it was so easy.

@jishnub
Copy link
Member

jishnub commented Dec 21, 2024

Looks fine to me, so barring further comments, I would suggest merging.

@jishnub jishnub merged commit 7c0ecd6 into JuliaLang:master Dec 22, 2024
4 checks passed
@araujoms araujoms deleted the patch-1 branch December 22, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NaN values in SVD of zero matrix wrapped in Diagonal

4 participants