Skip to content

avoid division by zero in svd(::Diagonal) #1150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

avoid division by zero in svd(::Diagonal) #1150

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1e6183b
avoid division by zero in svd(::Diagonal)
araujoms Dec 15, 2024
bb5f566
add test
araujoms Dec 16, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/diagonal.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1024,8 +1024,8 @@ function svd(D::Diagonal{T}) where {T<:Number}
Vt = copy(U)
for i in 1:length(d)
j = piv[i]
U[j,i] = d[j] / S[i]
Vt[i,j] = one(Td)
U[j,i] = iszero(d[j]) ? oneunit(Td) : d[j] / S[i]
Vt[i,j] = oneunit(Td)
end
return SVD(U, S, Vt)
end
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion test/diagonal.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -463,7 +463,8 @@ Random.seed!(1)
end
end

@testset "svd (#11120/#11247)" begin
@testset "svd (#11120/#11247/#1149)" begin
D[1] = 0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this changing D for all the tests coming after this? I see that tests pass, but perhaps it's better to introduce a small new testset with the example you gave in the original issue:

d = [1, 2, 3, 4, 0]
@test svd(diagm(d)) == svd(Diagonal(d))

?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it is. That was intentional, as the subsequent test was also failing for singular matrices. I thought about doing that when D is generated in the first place, as a zero is more useful test than a random number, but decided against because that would be confusing.

I don't have anything to do with issue, though, I just randomly found it and decided to fix it because it was so easy.

U, s, V = svd(D)
@test (U*Diagonal(s))*V' ≈ D
@test svdvals(D) == s
Expand Down
Loading