Skip to content

Conversation

@dylan-asmar
Copy link
Member

Fix for #575

There was a jldoctest that had an incorrect function identifier. For those code blocks, I don't think the jldoctest is providing us any value, but kept it in for now and udpated it.

@dylan-asmar dylan-asmar merged commit 9533511 into master Oct 15, 2025
17 of 22 checks passed
@dylan-asmar dylan-asmar deleted the doc_updates branch October 15, 2025 01:53
@zsunberg
Copy link
Member

Hmmm... This was not enough to fix it to get it working on my machine for some reason. Strange. I will make it a more robust fix with a filter so that if the number changes in the future.

I do think the doctests add value because it ensures that old incorrect code does not make it into the doc examples. (but maybe an @example block is more appropriate though)

In any case, THANK YOU @dylan-asmar for fixing!

@dylan-asmar
Copy link
Member Author

There was also an issue with TagPOMDPProblem that might have been causing an error after you fixed this one. There was a compat problem with MetaGraphs (needed 0.8)

I do agree that doctests are useful and awesome. I was just saying for that particular block.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants