Skip to content

Conversation

luojiyin1987
Copy link

@luojiyin1987 luojiyin1987 commented Sep 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the production deployment workflow to use the latest version of the checkout action, aligning with current best practices and security updates. No changes to the deployment steps or logic.
    • No user-facing changes; application behavior remains the same.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the GitHub Actions workflow for production deployment by bumping actions/checkout from v3 to v5 in .github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml. No other steps or logic were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI workflow version bump
.github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml
Update actions/checkout from v3 to v5; no other modifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I thump my paws—a tidy hop,
Our pipeline gets a shiny prop.
From v3 to v5 we go,
The gears still whir, the builds still flow.
A carrot toast to versions new—
Deploys remain as crisp as dew.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "CI: actions/checkout v3 to v5" succinctly and accurately describes the primary change — upgrading actions/checkout in the CI workflow. It is concise, specific, and directly related to the changeset, allowing a reviewer to understand the main intent at a glance. The title avoids unnecessary noise and focuses on the most important change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch CI/update-actions-checkout

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

dosubot bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Related Documentation

Checked 10 published document(s). No updates required.

How did I do? Any feedback?  Join Discord

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml (1)

46-53: Use key‑based SSH auth and pin host keys; avoid “password” fields for keys.

You’re passing a secret named SSH_KEY into password. Prefer private key inputs and host key pinning for both actions. Also separate SSH auth from sudo creds. (github.com)

-              with:
-                  local: ./build
-                  remote: /tmp/${{ env.BOX_NAME }}
-                  host: ${{ secrets.HOST }}
-                  username: ${{ secrets.USER }}
-                  password: ${{ secrets.SSH_KEY }}
+              with:
+                  local: ./build
+                  remote: /tmp/${{ env.BOX_NAME }}
+                  host: ${{ secrets.HOST }}
+                  username: ${{ secrets.USER }}
+                  privateKey: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_SSH_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+                  passphrase: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_SSH_PASSPHRASE }}
-              with:
-                  host: ${{ secrets.HOST }}
-                  username: ${{ secrets.USER }}
-                  password: ${{ secrets.SSH_KEY }}
+              with:
+                  host: ${{ secrets.HOST }}
+                  username: ${{ secrets.USER }}
+                  key: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_SSH_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+                  passphrase: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_SSH_PASSPHRASE }}
+                  fingerprint: ${{ secrets.HOST_SSH_FINGERPRINT }}

Optional: keep a separate secret for sudo (don’t reuse SSH creds) and consider avoiding sudo by granting the deploy user minimal required privileges.

Also applies to: 55-60

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml (2)

25-26: Update Docker setup actions to v3 (current recommended).

Both actions have v3 as the current line; upgrade for maintained features and fixes.

-            - uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v2
-            - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v2
+            - uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v3
+            - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3

Refs show v3 in examples/readme. (github.com)


29-29: Consider bumping docker/build-push-action to v6.

v6 is the current stable and aligns with newer cache/back-end requirements and docs. This future‑proofs builds (e.g., GA cache API v2 era). (docs.docker.com)

-              uses: docker/build-push-action@v3
+              uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90444ce and c0e9604.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-oss.yml (1)

23-23: Good bump to actions/checkout v5; verify runner compatibility if self‑hosted.

V5 is live and uses the Node 24 runtime; it requires Actions Runner ≥ v2.327.1. On GitHub‑hosted runners you’re fine; for any self‑hosted, confirm runner version. (github.com)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant