Fix missing multiplication operator in pendulum example #799
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR fixes a syntax error in the getting started documentation where a multiplication operator was missing between a numeric literal and a function call.
Problem
In the pendulum example, the external torque was defined as:
This is invalid Julia syntax. While you can write
2x
for multiplication with variables, you cannot write0.1sin(t)
- you need an explicit multiplication operator between a numeric literal and a function call.Solution
Fixed the syntax to:
Impact
This fixes a syntax error that would cause the code example to fail when users try to execute it, improving the user experience when following the getting started tutorial.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code