BUG-T19: Audit Log and Session Timeline are inconsistent with tool charts in multi-process runs

[SoundBlaster]

Description

Fixes BUG-T19 by making audit/session dashboard views consistent in multi-process runs.

Changes included:

• Refresh AuditLogger read paths from shared JSONL audit files when file metadata changes.
• Ensure /api/audit, /api/sessions, and exports consume the same refreshed shared audit history.
• Add regression coverage:
  • tests/unit/webui/test_audit.py
  • tests/unit/webui/test_server.py
  • tests/integration/webui/test_e2e.py
• Update docs and DocC pages for multi-process consistency/troubleshooting guidance.
• Archive task artifacts:
  • SPECS/ARCHIVE/BUG-T19_Audit_Log_and_Session_Timeline_are_inconsistent_with_tool_charts_in_multi_process_runs/

Validation artifact:

• SPECS/ARCHIVE/BUG-T19_Audit_Log_and_Session_Timeline_are_inconsistent_with_tool_charts_in_multi_process_runs/BUG-T19_Validation_Report.md

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Documentation update
• Refactoring
• CI/CD improvement

Quality Gates

Before submitting, ensure all quality gates pass:

make check

Or run individually:

• make test - All tests pass with ≥90% coverage
• make lint - No linting errors
• make format - Code is properly formatted
• make typecheck - Type checking passes
• make doccheck - Documentation is synced with DocC (if docs changed)

Documentation Sync

If you modified files in docs/, ensure corresponding DocC files are also updated:

docs/ file	DocC file
docs/installation.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/Installation.md
docs/cursor-setup.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/CursorSetup.md
docs/claude-setup.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/ClaudeCodeSetup.md
docs/codex-setup.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/CodexCLISetup.md
docs/troubleshooting.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/Troubleshooting.md
docs/architecture.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/Architecture.md
docs/environment-variables.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/EnvironmentVariables.md
README.md	mcpbridge-wrapper.docc/mcpbridge-wrapper.md

• Documentation changes are synced with DocC catalog (or N/A)

Testing

• Added/updated tests for new functionality
• All tests pass locally
• Manually tested the changes

Checklist

• Code follows the project's style guidelines
• Self-review completed
• Comments added for complex code
• Documentation updated (if needed)
• No new warnings generated
• PR title is descriptive

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9335023d63

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".