Skip to content

Conversation

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

The workflows for working with pages artifacts are not as smart as the standard artifact routines. As such, the aggregation of previous artifacts must take place in the deploy script so the final artifact generated will have the same run-id as the deploy step that fetches it.

Fixes: 2d64c49 (feat(cicd): automated builds and deployment to pages, 2024-11-19)

The workflows for working with pages artifacts are not as smart as the
standard artifact routines. As such, the aggregation of previous
artifacts must take place in the deploy script so the final artifact
generated will have the same run-id as the deploy step that fetches it.

Fixes: 2d64c49 (feat(cicd): automated builds and deployment to pages, 2024-11-19)
Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]>
@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member Author

Actual working run: https://github.com/StaticRocket/processor-sdk-doc/actions/runs/12300934415

Somehow the CI branch in my last PR was not correctly updated and a previous (broken) version of the pipeline was merged.

@cshilwant cshilwant merged commit 993e4f4 into TexasInstruments:master Dec 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants