Skip to content

Conversation

alxkm
Copy link
Member

@alxkm alxkm commented Jul 13, 2025

  • Enhanced class and method Javadocs with clearer descriptions and formatting.
  • Used Map.getOrDefault() to simplify frequency counting.
  • Cleaned up code style and imports for consistency.
  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
  • All filenames are in PascalCase.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
  • All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.60%. Comparing base (dcb02c6) to head (cd6c5b7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6381      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     74.61%   74.60%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     5456     5453       -3     
============================================
  Files           682      682              
  Lines         19011    19009       -2     
  Branches       3671     3670       -1     
============================================
- Hits          14186    14182       -4     
- Misses         4262     4263       +1     
- Partials        563      564       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@DenizAltunkapan
Copy link
Member

I will review this and the other PR's tomorrow step by step @alxkm

@alxkm
Copy link
Member Author

alxkm commented Jul 15, 2025

@DenizAltunkapan, thank you for taking the time to review my PRs - I really appreciate it.
Just to clarify: the changes I usually submit are aimed at incremental improvements rather than major refactoring. That said, I understand that reviewing them still takes time and effort, especially with build waits and the need to merge the latest changes into new PRs.

If it makes sense to you, feel free to simply mark the PRs that have passed your review — I’d be happy to handle the merging afterward. I've used this approach in this repository before, and it worked well. Thanks again.

@DenizAltunkapan DenizAltunkapan merged commit d55e89d into TheAlgorithms:master Jul 16, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants