Skip to content

Conversation

Luffy2004-c
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Implement strict mode to forbid extra fields in configuration
  • Add comprehensive type validation for configuration fields
  • Update documentation to explain new strict mode and validation features
  • Add tests for type validation and strict mode functionality

This change enhances configuration safety by ensuring type correctness and preventing typos in configuration files through strict field validation.

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

Checklist

  • I've read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md document.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTING.md guide.
  • I've updated the code style using make codestyle.
  • I've written tests for all new methods and classes that I created.
  • I've written the docstring in Google format for all the methods and classes that I used.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @Luffy2004-c, thanks for opening your first pull request 😊! We really appreciate your work. Happy Coding 🎉🎊 !

@Luffy2004-c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

image

- Implement strict mode to forbid extra fields in configuration
- Add comprehensive type validation for configuration fields
- Update documentation to explain new strict mode and validation features
- Add tests for type validation and strict mode functionality

This change enhances configuration safety by ensuring type correctness
and preventing typos in configuration files through strict field validation.
@Luffy2004-c Luffy2004-c force-pushed the opt-dataclass-check branch from 845b981 to 8534abf Compare May 24, 2025 06:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant