Skip to content

Astros's duplicate trailing slash feature leads to an open redirection security issue

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 7, 2025 in withastro/astro • Updated Aug 8, 2025

Package

npm astro (npm)

Affected versions

>= 5.2.0, < 5.12.8

Patched versions

5.12.8

Description

Summary

There is an Open Redirection vulnerability in the trailing slash redirection logic when handling paths with double slashes. This allows an attacker to redirect users to arbitrary external domains by crafting URLs such as https://mydomain.com//malicious-site.com/. This increases the risk of phishing and other social engineering attacks.

This affects Astro >=5.2.0 sites that use on-demand rendering (SSR) with the Node or Cloudflare adapter. It does not affect static sites, or sites deployed to Netlify or Vercel.

Background

Astro performs automatic redirection to the canonical URL, either adding or removing trailing slashes according to the value of the trailingSlash configuration option. It follows the following rules:

  • If trailingSlash is set to "never", https://example.com/page/ will redirect to https://example.com/page
  • If trailingSlash is set to "always", https://example.com/page will redirect to https://example.com/page/

It also collapses multiple trailing slashes, according to the following rules:

  • If trailingSlash is set to "always" or "ignore" (the default), https://example.com/page// will redirect to https://example.com/page/
  • If trailingSlash is set to "never", https://example.com/page// will redirect to https://example.com/page

It does this by returning a 301 redirect to the target path. The vulnerability occurs because it uses a relative path for the redirect. To redirect from https://example.com/page to https://example.com/page/, it sending a 301 response with the header Location: /page/. The browser resolves this URL relative to the original page URL and redirects to https://example.com/page/

Details

The vulnerability occurs if the target path starts with //. A request for https://example.com//page will send the header Location: //page/. The browser interprets this as a protocol-relative URL, so instead of redirecting to https://example.com//page/, it will attempt to redirect to https://page/. This is unlikely to resolve, but by crafting a URL in the form https://example.com//target.domain/subpath, it will send the header Location: //target.domain/subpath/, which the browser translates as a redirect to https://target.domain/subpath/. The subpath part is required because otherwise Astro will interpret /target.domain as a file download, which skips trailing slash handling.

This leads to an Open Redirect vulnerability.

The URL needed to trigger the vulnerability varies according to the trailingSlash setting.

  • If trailingSlash is set to "never", a URL in the form https://example.com//target.domain/subpath/
  • If trailingSlash is set to "always", a URL in the form https://example.com//target.domain/subpath
  • For any config value, a URL in the form https://example.com//target.domain/subpath//

Impact

This is classified as an Open Redirection vulnerability (CWE-601). It affects any user who clicks on a specially crafted link pointing to the affected domain. Since the domain appears legitimate, victims may be tricked into trusting the redirected page, leading to possible credential theft, malware distribution, or other phishing-related attacks.

No authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. Any unauthenticated user can trigger the redirect by clicking a malicious link.

Mitigation

You can test if your site is affected by visiting https://yoursite.com//docs.astro.build/en//. If you are redirected to the Astro docs then your site is affected and must be updated.

Upgrade your site to Astro 5.12.8. To mitigate at the network level, block outgoing redirect responses with a Location header value that starts with //.

References

@ematipico ematipico published to withastro/astro Aug 7, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 7, 2025
Reviewed Aug 7, 2025
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 8, 2025
Last updated Aug 8, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(4th percentile)

Weaknesses

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2025-54793

GHSA ID

GHSA-cq8c-xv66-36gw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.