Skip to content

Conversation

@SYaoJun
Copy link
Contributor

@SYaoJun SYaoJun commented Feb 9, 2026

Reason for this PR

There are two .clang-format under different directories.

We could remove one of them and move it to top directory, then other bindings can share the same configuration.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.21%. Comparing base (02bd3fe) to head (0c32747).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #850   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     80.21%   80.21%           
  Complexity      615      615           
=========================================
  Files            93       93           
  Lines         10257    10257           
  Branches       1049     1049           
=========================================
  Hits           8228     8228           
  Misses         1789     1789           
  Partials        240      240           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@SYaoJun SYaoJun force-pushed the duplic_clang_format branch 2 times, most recently from 2925077 to 881f038 Compare February 10, 2026 14:04
@SYaoJun SYaoJun force-pushed the duplic_clang_format branch from 881f038 to 0c32747 Compare February 12, 2026 12:01
@SYaoJun SYaoJun closed this Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants