Skip to content

Conversation

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member

@ypriverol ypriverol commented Nov 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the version requirement for the pyopenms dependency to ensure compatibility with version 2.4.0 or higher across multiple configuration files.
  • Chores

    • Modified environment.yml, pyproject.toml, recipe/meta.yaml, and requirements.txt to reflect the new version constraints for pyopenms.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces version constraints for the pyopenms dependency across multiple configuration files. Specifically, the version is set to require pyopenms version >=2.4.0 in environment.yml, pyproject.toml, recipe/meta.yaml, and requirements.txt. This change ensures that all relevant files specify a minimum version for pyopenms, enhancing dependency management without altering other dependencies or configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
environment.yml Updated pyopenms from unspecified to pyopenms>=2.4.0
pyproject.toml Updated pyopenms from * to pyopenms>=2.4.0
recipe/meta.yaml Updated pyopenms from unspecified to pyopenms>=2.4.0
requirements.txt Updated pyopenms from unspecified to pyopenms>=2.4.0

Possibly related PRs

  • ms2rescore fix version for DeepLC #34: The pyproject.toml file in this PR updates the version constraint for the pyopenms dependency, aligning with the changes made in the main PR to specify a version requirement for pyopenms.
  • forcing more versions for compatibility. #35: This PR also updates the pyopenms dependency to a specific version constraint, indicating a related change in dependency management similar to the main PR.

🐰 In the meadow, hops a rabbit bright,
With version constraints, it takes flight.
"Pyopenms, oh, two point four,
A stable path for us to explore!"
Dependencies now in harmony,
A joyful dance, oh can't you see? 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ypriverol has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d0b50d and dd9a841.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d0b50d and dd9a841.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • environment.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • recipe/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • requirements.txt
  • environment.yml
  • recipe/meta.yaml
  • pyproject.toml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
environment.yml (1)

10-10: LGTM! Consider version pinning strategy.

The pyopenms version constraint aligns with the PR objective. However, I notice some dependencies use exact version pins (e.g., ms2rescore=3.0.3) while others use minimum version constraints (e.g., sdrf-pipelines>=0.0.31). Consider whether pyopenms should follow the same pinning strategy as other critical dependencies.

pyproject.toml (1)

Line range hint 10-10: Version constraint implementation is comprehensive.

The PR successfully implements the pyopenms version constraint (>=3.0.0) across all package management files:

  • environment.yml (conda)
  • meta.yaml (conda-forge)
  • pyproject.toml (pip/poetry)

This ensures consistent dependency resolution regardless of the installation method.

Also applies to: 27-27, 35-35

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5620ead and 3d0b50d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • environment.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • recipe/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • requirements.txt
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipe/meta.yaml (1)

27-27: LGTM! Verify pyopenms Python compatibility.

The version constraint is consistent with environment.yml. Since there's a Python version constraint of >=3.8,<3.11, let's verify pyopenms 3.0.0 compatibility with these Python versions.

✅ Verification successful

Python version compatibility is properly constrained

The package explicitly defines Python version constraints (>=3.8,<3.11) in meta.yaml, and pyopenms>=3.0.0 is consistently specified across environment.yml, requirements.txt, and meta.yaml. The Python version constraints are properly defined in the build configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check pyopenms 3.0.0 Python version compatibility
# Expected: Should support Python 3.8-3.10

# Check package metadata for Python version support
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/pyopenms/3.0.0/json | jq '.info.classifiers[] | select(contains("Programming Language :: Python"))'

Length of output: 131


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check pyopenms compatibility
# First check if there's any explicit Python version requirements in environment.yml
rg "python" environment.yml -A 2 -B 2

# Also check if there are any other files mentioning pyopenms version requirements
rg "pyopenms" --type yaml --type txt

Length of output: 182


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete environment.yml and meta.yaml files to understand the full context
cat environment.yml
echo "---"
cat recipe/meta.yaml

Length of output: 1442

@ypriverol ypriverol changed the title forcing openms version higher than 3.0.0 forcing openms version higher than 2.4.0 Nov 30, 2024
@ypriverol ypriverol merged commit e6f2d61 into main Nov 30, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants