Skip to content

Conversation

@lum1n0us
Copy link
Collaborator

@lum1n0us lum1n0us commented Nov 3, 2025

No description provided.

@lum1n0us lum1n0us force-pushed the fix/cmake_error_unsupported branch 4 times, most recently from ed5f4bd to 2d61745 Compare November 10, 2025 07:23
FAST_JIT and classic interp mode without SIMD support
to replace multi-tier-jit + running mode.

Multi-tier-jit contains both fast-jit and llvm-jit. Fast-jit doesn't support
SIMD, but llvm-jit does. So, should multi-tier-jit support SIMD?

My answer is NO.

- The regular form of multi-tier-jit uses fast-jit as tier1 and llvm-jit as
  tier2. Therefore, if fast-jit doesn't support SIMD, the entire multi-tier
  doesn't support SIMD either.
- `--fast-jit` and `--llvm-jit` of multi-tier-jit  should adhere to the global
  limitations of multi-tier-jit.
@lum1n0us lum1n0us force-pushed the fix/cmake_error_unsupported branch from 8ed73d7 to 5fbc247 Compare November 11, 2025 08:23
@lum1n0us lum1n0us force-pushed the fix/cmake_error_unsupported branch from 9a8dca0 to 7559e3f Compare November 11, 2025 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants