Skip to content

Conversation

@meguruli
Copy link

  • Fix 8-byte stride issue when reading multiple words from serialized bytes
  • Add test case to verify multi-word marshal/unmarshal roundtrip works correctly
  • The bug was using 1-byte stride (12+i:20+i) instead of 8-byte stride (12+i8:20+i8)

Fixes serialization/deserialization for BitVectors larger than 64 bits.

- Fix 8-byte stride issue when reading multiple words from serialized bytes
- Add test case to verify multi-word marshal/unmarshal roundtrip works correctly
- The bug was using 1-byte stride (12+i:20+i) instead of 8-byte stride (12+i*8:20+i*8)

Fixes serialization/deserialization for BitVectors larger than 64 bits.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @meguruli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical bug in the BitVector deserialization logic, specifically within the unmarshal_bytes function. The core issue stemmed from an incorrect byte stride calculation when processing multiple 64-bit words, which led to data corruption for BitVectors exceeding 64 bits. By adjusting the stride to correctly account for 8-byte words, the PR ensures accurate reconstruction of larger bit vectors from their serialized byte representation. A new comprehensive test case has been introduced to validate this fix and prevent future regressions.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Corrected an 8-byte stride issue in the BitVector::unmarshal_bytes function, which previously used a 1-byte stride, leading to incorrect deserialization of multi-word bit vectors.
  • Impact: This fix resolves serialization/deserialization problems for BitVectors larger than 64 bits, ensuring data integrity for larger bit vector operations.
  • New Test Case: Added a new test case, marshal_unmarshal_bytes_roundtrip_multiword, to specifically verify the correct roundtrip functionality for multi-word BitVectors after serialization and deserialization.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a stride bug in the BitVector::unmarshal_bytes function, ensuring that multi-word bit vectors are deserialized correctly. The addition of a specific test case for a 128-bit vector is excellent for verifying the fix and preventing future regressions. The changes are logical and well-implemented. I have one suggestion to refactor the deserialization loop for improved readability and a minor performance gain.

Comment on lines 372 to 374
for i in 0..<words_needed {
data[i] = bytes[12 + i:20 + i].to_uint64_le()
data[i] = bytes[12 + i*8:20 + i*8].to_uint64_le()
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the fix is correct, this loop can be made more readable and slightly more efficient by avoiding the multiplication on each iteration. Using an offset variable that is incremented by the word size makes the logic clearer.

For example:

  let mut offset = 12
  for i in 0..<words_needed {
    data[i] = bytes[offset:offset + 8].to_uint64_le()
    offset += 8
  }

As a follow-up, you might consider defining constants for the magic numbers used in serialization (e.g., header size 12, word size 8) to improve maintainability.

- Use offset variable to avoid multiplication on each iteration
- Improves code clarity and minor performance gain
- Addresses code review feedback from gemini-code-assist
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant