-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 3
fix: correct stride bug in BitVector::unmarshal_bytes #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: correct stride bug in BitVector::unmarshal_bytes #2
Conversation
- Fix 8-byte stride issue when reading multiple words from serialized bytes - Add test case to verify multi-word marshal/unmarshal roundtrip works correctly - The bug was using 1-byte stride (12+i:20+i) instead of 8-byte stride (12+i*8:20+i*8) Fixes serialization/deserialization for BitVectors larger than 64 bits.
Summary of ChangesHello @meguruli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical bug in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a stride bug in the BitVector::unmarshal_bytes function, ensuring that multi-word bit vectors are deserialized correctly. The addition of a specific test case for a 128-bit vector is excellent for verifying the fix and preventing future regressions. The changes are logical and well-implemented. I have one suggestion to refactor the deserialization loop for improved readability and a minor performance gain.
| for i in 0..<words_needed { | ||
| data[i] = bytes[12 + i:20 + i].to_uint64_le() | ||
| data[i] = bytes[12 + i*8:20 + i*8].to_uint64_le() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While the fix is correct, this loop can be made more readable and slightly more efficient by avoiding the multiplication on each iteration. Using an offset variable that is incremented by the word size makes the logic clearer.
For example:
let mut offset = 12
for i in 0..<words_needed {
data[i] = bytes[offset:offset + 8].to_uint64_le()
offset += 8
}As a follow-up, you might consider defining constants for the magic numbers used in serialization (e.g., header size 12, word size 8) to improve maintainability.
- Use offset variable to avoid multiplication on each iteration - Improves code clarity and minor performance gain - Addresses code review feedback from gemini-code-assist
Fixes serialization/deserialization for BitVectors larger than 64 bits.