Skip to content

Conversation

leonardogiannini
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

The PR improves the initialStep of mkFit currently used by default in phase2.

Propagation to plane is introduced in the backward fit and set as the default in phase2.

Additionally a bug is corrected in the getS function in RecoTracker/MkFitCore/src/PropagationMPlexPlane.cc and the number of step used in the propagation to plane before adding the hit is reduced from 5 to 2, without compromising the physics performance.

The PR should be tested with the new json file from this PR to cms-data: PR18

PR validation:

MTV validation plots can be found here: MTV-bkwdfitPR.

In particular the efficiency, fake and duplicate rates all improve in the initialStep (at build level, but also after selections), see example plots as a function of eta (blue before PR, red after):

image image

At the same time the average number of hits increases by ~0.4.

image

The choice of number of iterations doens't change the results, so we opted for 2 steps to reduce the timing, see MTV-bkwdfitPR-Niter (initialStep).

The build and fit time for the initialStep are both reduced (MTV-bkwdfitPR-timing), as shown in the plot below:

image

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 22, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48970/46144

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @leonardogiannini for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoTracker/MkFitCMS (reconstruction)
  • RecoTracker/MkFitCore (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @felicepantaleo, @gpetruc, @makortel, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 23, 2025

test parameters:

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 23, 2025

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fa26f6/48253/summary.html
COMMIT: 48a8598
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_0_X_2025-09-23-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/48970/48253/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fa26f6/48253/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fa26f6/48253/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 72 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4142809
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 89737
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 28
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4053024
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.098 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0010001 ): -0.008 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0040001 ): -0.090 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • Checked 226 log files, 198 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 24, 2025

+1

it looks like the bot is still down
#48971 (comment)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)
Notice This PR was tested with additional Pull Request(s), please also merge them if necessary: cms-data/RecoTracker-MkFit#18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants