Skip to content

Conversation

@Arpan-206
Copy link
Contributor

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 commented Jul 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved test workflow reliability by separating environment cleanup and permission adjustments from zsh test execution.
    • Updated test steps to run with explicit bash shell and removed the use of the script command during test execution.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jul 28, 2025

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for running zsh tests on Alpine has been refactored. The previous single step using script and sudo has been split into two: one for cleaning zsh configurations and adjusting permissions with sudo, and another for running the tests without sudo or script, with a simplified prompt.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow Refactor
.github/workflows/test.yml
Split the zsh test step into two: one for pre-cleaning configs and permissions with sudo, and one for running tests without sudo or script.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Workflow
    participant Runner
    participant Sudo
    participant Zsh Test

    Workflow->>Runner: Pre-clean zsh config with sudo
    Runner->>Sudo: Remove zsh config files, chown dist/
    Sudo-->>Runner: Cleanup complete

    Workflow->>Runner: Run zsh tests without sudo
    Runner->>Zsh Test: Set PS1, run make test_zsh
    Zsh Test-->>Runner: Test results
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

The bunny hops through workflows neat,
Sweeping zsh configs off their feet.
With sudo done and tests in line,
The prompt is simple, the code is fine.
No scripts to wrap, just bash and cheer—
The tests now run with nothing to fear!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0d7c59 and d395d3a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor Bugbot
  • GitHub Check: test-all-shells
  • GitHub Check: test-flakiness
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch arpan/cc-1840-figure-out-test-failure-for-shell-challenge

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 force-pushed the arpan/cc-1840-figure-out-test-failure-for-shell-challenge branch from 8042b78 to b032058 Compare July 28, 2025 15:08
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

83-87: Make the test step fail fast & reproducible

Consider adding strict bash flags so the step aborts on the first non-zero exit and on undefined variables; this prevents silent skips:

-          export PS1="$ "
-          make test_zsh
+          set -euo pipefail
+          export PS1="$ "
+          make test_zsh

Minor, but it hardens the workflow against future edits that append additional commands.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52f0555 and d0d7c59.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor Bugbot
  • GitHub Check: test-all-shells
  • GitHub Check: test-flakiness

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 force-pushed the arpan/cc-1840-figure-out-test-failure-for-shell-challenge branch from 1ca5d30 to 4c87e38 Compare July 31, 2025 15:13
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 requested a review from rohitpaulk July 31, 2025 15:22
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 force-pushed the arpan/cc-1840-figure-out-test-failure-for-shell-challenge branch from 050d354 to 5caef0a Compare July 31, 2025 16:04
@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 requested a review from rohitpaulk July 31, 2025 16:07
Copy link
Member

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(minor comment, good to go once addressed!)

- name: Run tests against all shells on alpine
- name: Run zsh tests with proper terminal setup
run: |
export PS1="$ "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's do these in internal/test_helpers/zsh/your_shell.sh, so that make test_zsh works directly without any additions

@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 merged commit fef0174 into main Jul 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@Arpan-206 Arpan-206 deleted the arpan/cc-1840-figure-out-test-failure-for-shell-challenge branch July 31, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants