Open
Conversation
andorsk
force-pushed
the
ask/records-write
branch
from
7752d05 to
ecff360
Compare
LiranCohen
reviewed
Sep 6, 2023
spec/spec.md
Outdated
| "required": [ | ||
| "authorization", | ||
| "descriptor", | ||
| "recordId" |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we need to keep all 3 in here.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@LiranCohen I used the latest https://github.com/TBD54566975/dwn-sdk-js/blob/main/json-schemas/interface-methods/records-write-unidentified.json#L148. Am I missing something?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@andorsk yeah this is just an implementation specific helper-schema that is used when creating a message that has not yet been signed by the signer. But a complete valid RecordsWrite message has to have all of those properties for it to be valid.
TallTed
suggested changes
Sep 7, 2023
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: LiranCohen <c.liran.c@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
LiranCohen
requested changes
Sep 20, 2023
| - The message object ****MUST**** contain a `recordId` property, and its value ****MUST**** be the `recordId` of the logical record with which the entry corresponds. If the message is the initial entry for a new record, the value ****MUST**** be set to the string resulting from the [_Record ID Generation Process_](#recordid-generation). | ||
| - The object ****MAY**** contain a `contextId` property. If present, its value ****MUST**** be the deterministic ID for a contextually linked set of objects. | ||
| - The object ****MAY**** contain an `attestation` property. If present, its value ****MUST**** be a `string` representing the signing conditions detailed below. If the property is not present, evaluators ****MUST**** treat it as if its value was set to `optional`. | ||
| - If the message object is attached to a Protocol, the value of its `contextId` property ****MUST**** be a [_Computed Context ID_](#computed-context-ids). If the message is not attached to a Protocol, it ****MUST NOT**** contain a `contextId` property. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line should be folded into the rules described on line 841 or into bullet points under a single contextId line.
| - The object ****MAY**** contain an `encryption` property, and if present its value ****Must**** be a string that matches one of the [Supported Encryption Formats](#supported-encryption-format), indicating the encryption format with which the data is encrypted. The absence of this property indicates the data is not encrypted. | ||
| - The object ****MAY**** include a `parentId` property if the currently active entry for the record is a `RecordsDelete` or a `CollectionWrite` that has a declared Commit Strategy. The object ****MUST NOT**** contain a `parentId` under any other circumstance. If present, the value of the `parentId` property ****MUST**** be the stringified [Version 1 CID](https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/content-addressing/#identifier-formats) of the [DAG CBOR](https://github.com/ipld/specs/blob/master/block-layer/codecs/dag-cbor.md) encoded `descriptor` object of the previous `RecordsWrite` or `RecordsDelete` entry the message is intended to overwrite. | ||
| - The object ****MAY**** contain a `protocol` property. If present, its value ****MUST**** be a URI that denotes the Protocol of which the object is a part. | ||
| - If the object contains a `protocol` property, the object ****MUST**** also contain a `protocolVersion` property. If present, its value ****MUST**** be a [SemVer](https://semver.org/) string that denotes the version of the Protocol of which the object is a part. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we currently do not use a protocolVersion property. I think there were talks of this in the past, but at the moment it's not used.
However there is a protocolPath property, and when it is specified the protocol property MUST be specified as well.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
starting point to update records write. needs some work before merge, so adding as draft.