Skip to content

Conversation

shmuel44
Copy link
Contributor

@shmuel44 shmuel44 requested a review from adi88d as a code owner September 21, 2025 09:32
@shmuel44 shmuel44 added the ready-for-pipeline-running Whether the pr is ready for running the whole pipeline, including testing on SAAS machines label Sep 21, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 21, 2025

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
Packs/rasterize/Integrations/rasterize
   rasterize.py61313278%82–84, 91–93, 99–101, 141, 156–158, 161–163, 166, 169–171, 175–177, 189–190, 194–195, 199–200, 225–227, 280–285, 307–309, 324–326, 369, 372–373, 406–411, 419–420, 425, 444, 463–464, 488, 504, 531–532, 591–592, 595–598, 600, 740–742, 1049–1051, 1071–1073, 1084, 1089–1095, 1097–1102, 1104–1107, 1109, 1131–1132, 1239, 1251–1252, 1289, 1291–1292, 1310–1311, 1314–1315, 1317, 1325, 1328–1331, 1333–1340, 1342–1345, 1531–1534
TOTAL61313278% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
81 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 56.449s ⏱️

@content-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Validate summary
The following errors were thrown as a part of this pr: .
If the AG100 validation in the pre-commit GitHub Action fails, the pull request cannot be force-merged.

Verdict: PR can be force merged from validate perspective? ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@adi88d adi88d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-pipeline-running Whether the pr is ready for running the whole pipeline, including testing on SAAS machines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants