Prevent potential SIGSEGV crash due to null opusEncoder reference in AudioConnection #2880
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Etiquette
Changes
Closes Issue: None reported yet, possibly due to the rarity and specific conditions of occurrence.
Description
This PR adds an explicit null check before calling
Opus.INSTANCE.opus_encode()
to prevent potential SIGSEGV crashes caused by anull
opusEncoder
reference.Why is this needed?
Our production Discord bot, which serves over 1.3 million users, has experienced occasional JVM crashes (SIGSEGV in native opus code), approximately once per month. After analyzing JVM crash logs (hs_err_1.log), we identified that the cause was a null pointer (
RDI=0x0
) being passed to the nativeopus_encode()
method via JNA.The stack trace clearly showed:
This issue happens despite the existing null checks at higher abstraction levels, suggesting a potential race condition scenario—possibly due to concurrent audio connection closure and encoding operations.
How this change helps
By adding this explicit null check:
we ensure:
Expected scenarios where this exception might be thrown:
opus_encoder_create()
returningnull
due to unsupported sample rates or invalid arguments).Testing & Reproducibility
Additional context
Note