Interface factory unit tests

[rozyczko]

This class had ZERO unit test coverage. Now we have it covered.

Also, added codecov.

For this branch, check out
https://app.codecov.io/gh/EasyScience/corelib/tree/interface_factory_unit_tests

[github-actions]

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: ['chore', 'fix', 'bugfix', 'bug', 'enhancement', 'feature', 'dependencies', 'documentation']

[rozyczko]

The current unit test coverage is a bit over 75%. Need to improve that to at least 80%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.10%. Comparing base (952da19) to head (2fb42f4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #151      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    73.14%   80.10%   +6.95%     
===========================================
  Files           48       48              
  Lines         4092     4091       -1     
  Branches       715      715              
===========================================
+ Hits          2993     3277     +284     
+ Misses         896      630     -266     
+ Partials       203      184      -19     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	80.10% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/easyscience/global_object/map.py	89.41% <100.00%> (+37.31%)	⬆️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[rozyczko]

It's 79.71% 💀
I'm stopping here

[henrikjacobsenfys]

I'm not too familiar with the interface factory and global object, but it looks good to me. I have only two minor comments/questions.

[damskii9992]

Shouldn't this PR go into develop? Why is it going into Master?

[rozyczko]

Shouldn't this PR go into develop? Why is it going into Master?

because I'm a blind numpty. Fixed.

[rozyczko]

80.23%. There we go.