-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
Included client_assertion_type and client_assertion when other auth m… #714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
pendula95
wants to merge
4
commits into
eclipse-vertx:master
Choose a base branch
from
pendula95:713-allow-specifying-clientId-together-with-clientassertion-clientassertiontype
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c16de01
Included client_assertion_type and client_assertion when other auth m…
pendula95 6748550
Merge branch 'eclipse-vertx:master' into 713-allow-specifying-clientI…
pendula95 b97026a
Add tests to verify client authentication via client assertion
pendula95 d5de1ad
Cleaned client authentication process via client assertion
pendula95 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright (c) 2011-2024 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation | ||
| * | ||
| * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the | ||
| * terms of the Eclipse Public License 2.0 which is available at | ||
| * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0, or the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
| * which is available at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0. | ||
| * | ||
| * SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0 | ||
| */ | ||
| open module io.vertx.tests { | ||
| requires io.vertx.auth.oauth2; | ||
| requires io.vertx.auth.jwt; | ||
| requires io.vertx.auth.common; | ||
| requires io.vertx.testing.unit; | ||
| requires junit; | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a shortcut that might introduce unexpected behaviors for some users
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry but I'm not an expert in that area. Can you elaborate about why this might come unexpected for some users? Especially as it seems you say the current behavior is broken in the other comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are 2 ways how to use assertion. Both defined: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7521
This PR fixes incorrect implementation for Using Assertions for Client Authentication
As test were missing that would catch this, it was overlooked. This has been fixed by the PR and I am quite familiar with this.
On the other hand most of the code that is present its goal was to facilitate Using Assertions as Authorization Grants which I have limited knowledge. And looking at the test non of them validate the functionality so I am not 100% sure that something was not broken by this PR.